Connect with us

NBA

NBA Daily: Remembering The Mikhail Prokhorov Era

Despite his bravado, Mikhail Prokhorov led the Nets to a purgatory of mediocrity for the majority of his time in charge. David Weissman looks back on the Russian billionaire’s tenure as owner.

David Weissman

Published

on

“We’re going to turn Knicks fans into Nets fans… I expect us to be in the playoffs next season and [win a] championship in one-year minimum, and maximum in five years,” said Mikhail Prokhorov, introducing himself at a press conference on May 19, 2010 while announcing his purchase of the New Jersey Nets.

With that statement alone, Prokhorov put the association on notice that, for better or worse, he was going to be aggressively pursuing championships. Despite his bravado, Prokhorov led the Nets to a purgatory of mediocrity for the majority of his tenure. His legacy as an owner will be defined by lopsided trades that handicapped the growth of the Nets until he gave up decision-making control of the roster.

Few in the NBA world knew about Prokhorov beyond his reputation as a Russian billionaire with a crew cut-like haircut and a cunning smirk. In his first interview on 60 Minutes, he was portrayed as a martial arts enthusiast, an aggressive businessman and a man so wealthy that he could casually lose a 50-foot yacht.

Prokhorov claimed to have a deep passion for Russian politics and once ran for president against Vladimir Putin as a pro-western, free trade candidate. Later, information surfaced revealing Prokhorov’s deep ties to the Kremlin and the substantial benefits he received through dealings with Putin. He has been quoted about his connection to the Kremlin saying, “Yes, of course, I participated in them. What, don’t I live in this country?”

Then-NBA commissioner David Stern dismissed concerns about Prokhorov.

“We hire firms that have people like the former head of global operations for the CIA… [they do] investigations, and… there was nothing that we had learned from any of these relatively detailed investigations that would preclude Mr. Prokhorov from being approved as an owner in the NBA,” Stern said.

This statement was made despite rumors that Renaissance Capital, one of Prokhorov’s businesses, did business in Zimbabwe in defiance of U.S. sanctions. Notwithstanding all of these red flags about Prokhorov, Stern showed more concern for the state of the soon-to-be Brooklyn Nets.

In 2003, former owner of the New Jersey Nets, Bruce Ratner, bought the team for $300 million. His goal was to move the Nets to Brooklyn and build a world-class arena. Ratner pushed this project by lobbying New York City government and exercising eminent domain to remove hundreds of people out of their homes for the arena to be built.

But, after an ugly decade of lawsuits, delays, street protests and the Great Recession, Ratner couldn’t come up with the required $100 million lump-sum payment to finish the project. Prokhorov realized Ratner was in a weak position and saw an opportunity to strike a deal.

For $200 million, Prokhorov acquired 80 percent of the New Jersey Nets and 45 percent of the project to build a new club stadium from Bruce Ratner. In May 2010, the board of governors of the NBA approved the purchase of the Nets by Prokhorov, a move meant for the NBA to save face and allow the Nets to move to Brooklyn. Despite the red flags stemming from political corruption, backdoor dealings and skeptical ownership ability, the Prokhorov era began.

Prokhorov’s “win now” attitude meant going for superstars, regardless of physical condition or age, at the expense of the team’s future. The Nets had no long-term plan. The result was a string of offers to high caliber talent in the offseason, followed by rejection and ultimately settling for less talented players for almost the same price.

This pattern was clearest during the Summer of LeBron, a.k.a the 2010 free agency period. Prokhorov tried to persuade Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh and LeBron James to bring their talents to the Nets and start a new era of basketball in Brooklyn. Prokhorov’s fatal mistake was trying to lure these three superstars without a solidified general manager.

Despite his efforts, the Nets struck out on the superstar sweepstakes and settled on signing role players like Travis Outlaw, Jordan Farmar, Johan Petro and traded for Troy Murphy. After free agency, Prokhorov hired Billy King to be the general manager of the Nets, but the new owner still had significant say in roster decisions.

Still trying to find that missing superstar to lead the Nets into Brooklyn, Prokhorov tried to broker a three-team deal with the Nuggets and the Pistons that would send Carmelo Anthony, Richard Hamilton and Chauncey Billups to the Nets. That deal broke down twice and, instead, the Nets traded for a declining Deron Williams by giving up Derrick Favors, Devin Harris and two first-round picks. The Nets finished the 2010-2011 season with a 24-58 record, and yet, worse moves were still to come.

The next summer Prokhorov decided Williams was not enough to get the Nets to the next level, so he targeted the most dominant center in the league at that time, Dwight Howard. The Nets went all in, offering the Magic a three-team deal in which the Nets would send three unprotected first-round picks (2011, 2013 and 2015) to the Trail Blazers for Gerald Wallace. Wallace would have been packaged along with Brook Lopez and two other Nets picks – their own in 2017 and the Rockets 2011 pick – for Howard, Hedo Turkoglu and Chris Duhon. The Magic rejected the offer.

Desperate to make a move that summer, the Nets settled on sending Mehmet Okur, Shawne Williams and a first-round pick to the Trail Blazers for an injury-prone Gerald Wallace, who only played 16 games that season. The pick sent to the Trail Blazers turned into Damian Lillard. In the 2011-2012 season, the Nets finished 22-44 in the lockout-shortened season.

Three years after Prokhorov purchased the Nets, they finally made the playoffs in their new home at the Barclays Center. The Nets won 49 games, the most in seven years, but ultimately fell to the Bulls in the opening round of the playoffs.

This led to Prokhorov’s defining moment as an owner. Despite making the playoffs, Prokhorov knew that the players he settled for could not deliver a championship win for the Nets. On July 12, 2013, desperate to have a championship team, Prokhorov made the riskiest trade in Nets – and possibly NBA – history.

The Nets traded Keith Bogans, MarShon Brooks, Kris Humphries, Kris Joseph, Gerald Wallace, a 2014 first-round pick, a 2016 first-round pick, a swap of 2017 first-round picks and a 2018 first-round pick for an aging Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce and Jason Terry (respectively 37, 36, and 36 years old).

Prokhorov thought he could claim some of the Celtics brilliance from their previous seasons of dominance, but the aging Celtics core failed to live up to expectations. The Nets did win 44 games, but ultimately lost to the Heat in the second round of the playoffs. Garnett and Terry played less than half of the 2013-2014 season. Pierce and Terry left the following summer. Garnett lasted only a half-season after that.

Billy King was ultimately fired and Sean Marks was hired as general manager to pick up the pieces. Without owning their draft pick until 2018, the Nets had traded away most of their future for a failed one-year experiment of trying to claim the glory of the Celtics.

Prokhorov gave the reins to Marks, who came with an actual strategy for a rebuild. He focused on absorbing other team’s salary in exchange for future draft picks and building through the draft.

In that time, Marks was able to acquire D’Angelo Russell, Caris LaVert, Spencer Dinwiddie, Jarrett Allen and Joe Harris, a foundation that ultimately led to Brooklyn’s acquisitions of Kyrie Irving, Kevin Durant and DeAndre Jordan during the 2019 offseason. These were the superstars that Prokhorov yearned for, making the Nets a championship contender once Durant becomes healthy again.

The Nets announced earlier this month that Prokhorov agreed to sell the Nets to Joseph Tsai, the billionaire co-founder of Alibaba. Tsai bought 49 percent of the team two years ago for $1 billion. He’ll get the rest for an additional $1.35 billion, bringing the purchase price to $2.35 billion. Despite all of Prokhorov’s personnel mistakes, he did make $2.15 billion off of his $200 million investment nine years ago, making the Nets’ team sale the largest in NBA history.

The Prokhorov era never delivered a championship to Brooklyn. It failed to land a superstar before this past offseason, and it failed to steal the heart of Knicks fans. This failure was due to a lack of basketball strategy and patience, where each offseason focused on getting the next best available player after striking out on a superstar.

It is no surprise that, as Prokhorov leaves the Nets, the future of the franchise has a renewed sense of championship potential.

Advertisement




Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NBA

Looking Toward The Draft: Power Forwards

Basketball Insiders continues their NBA Draft watch, this time with the power forwards.

David Yapkowitz

Published

on

We got some updated NBA draft news this week when the league announced that several key dates have been pushed back including the draft, the start of free agency and the beginning of the 2020-21 season.

The 2020 draft was originally scheduled for Oct. 16, but it will now likely occur sometime in November. Obviously, with the COVID-19 pandemic still wildly out of control in the United States, all of these potential deadlines are fluid and subject to change.

With that said, we’re continuing our position by position breakdown here at Basketball Insiders of some of the top 2020 draft prospects. We looked at the point guards and shooting guards last week, and this week we’re covering the small forwards and power forwards.

The power forward crop, like the draft overall, doesn’t appear to be as strong as recent years, that doesn’t mean there aren’t potential contributors and high-level NBA players available, as well as one who might just turn out to be a star-caliber player.

Onyeka Okongwu, USC – 19 years old

Okongwu is the player who just might develop into a star on some level. He was actually underrated in high school and was snubbed for a McDonald’s All-American selection his senior year. He established himself early on at USC as the team’s best player as a freshman and now appears to have turned some heads.

He’s been mentioned as a lottery pick and in some mock drafts, he’s top 4-5. He possesses a great all-around skill-set; he can score in the post, he can put the ball on the floor and attack and he can shoot. But perhaps his biggest attribute is his versatility on the defensive end. He’s got quick feet and mobility and can guard multiple positions.

Okongwu might actually play center in the NBA, especially in small-ball lineups, but he’s mostly played power forward and so he’ll probably see time there in the league. His skill-set fits perfectly with today’s game.

Obi Toppin, Dayton – 22 years old

Toppin is one of the older players in the draft, and in recent history, players that age tend to slip on draft boards. In Toppin’s case, it looks like the reverse might actually be true. He’s been projected as a lottery pick, and even going in the top 3.

He’s an incredibly athletic player who thrives in the open court. He looks like he’ll do well in an up-tempo offensive system that has capable playmakers who can find him in transition. He’s extremely active around the rim and he can finish strong. A decent shooter too, something he’ll need at the next level.

Toppin has the physical tools to be an effective defensive player, but that’s where the questions marks on him have been. In the NBA, he’s likely going to have to play and guard multiple positions. Whether or not he can adapt to that likely will answer the question as to what his ceiling can be.

Precious Achiuwa, Memphis – 20 years old

Achiuwa is another intriguing prospect. this writer actually got to watch him play in person while he was in high school and he was very impressive. He looked like a man among boys. He’s projected to be a late lottery pick.

He has an NBA-ready body and he’s got some toughness around the rim and in the paint. He was a double-double threat during his one season at Memphis and his knack for rebounding is something that should translate to the NBA. He’s a very good defender too, in particular, as a rim protector. He’s very quick and has the ability to guard multiple positions.

One of the main knocks on Achiuwa is his shooting ability. He didn’t shoot that well in college and power forwards being able to space the floor is almost a requirement in today’s NBA game. It’s something he can certainly work on and improve on though.

Honorable Mentions:
Paul Reed, DePaul – 21 years old
Xavier Tillman, Michigan State – 21 years old
Killian Tillie, Gonzaga – 22 years old

Continue Reading

NBA

Looking Toward the Draft: Small Forwards

Basketball Insiders’ examination of the 2020 draft class continues with a look at the small forwards.

Drew Maresca

Published

on

It was announced on Wednesday that the NBA Draft would be delayed from Oct. 16 to Nov. 18. The rationale is that the extra month gives the league and its players association more time to negotiate changes to the CBA. It also grants teams additional time to procure information on prospects and allows the NBA to establish regional virtual combines. But nothing is set in stone.

Still, draft prep must continue. This year’s draft class has more question marks than usual – which was complicated by the cancellation of the NCAA tournament (along with the NIT and a number of conference tournaments). There are incredibly skilled offensive players with limited offensive upside and jaw-droppingly talented defenders with incomplete offensive packages. But if (recent) history serves as a guide, there will be a few guys who make an immediate impact – and some of them very well could be small forwards.

The small forward position is key for the modern NBA. Want proof? Survey the league and you’ll find that most – if not all – contenders have an elite small forward – Milwaukee, Los Angeles (both), Boston, Miami, Toronto.

But the list of can’t miss small forward prospects feels smaller than usual. Scanning the numerous legitimate mock drafts (including our own by Steve Kyler), it becomes apparent that we lack a consensus on which small forwards will be selected (and in what order) after the top 3 or 4. Can any of them grow into a star? Maybe. Maybe not. But before we get too far ahead of ourselves, let’s identify what the top few bring to the table.

Deni Avdija, Israel – 19 years old

Avdija is a relatively well-rounded prospect who’s played professionally since he was 16. He boasts good height (6-foot-9) and uses it effectively to shoot over and pass around opposing defenses. Further, Avdija is an exceptional playmaker and he’s incredibly confident, enabling him to take chances many players would be apprehensive trying. Avdija is a high-IQ player. And what’s more, he’s a surprisingly strong defender. His height and above-average athleticism allow him to block shots, and he’s more physical than you’d expect him to be.

But there are drawbacks to Avdija, too. His main issue is around shooting. Avdija shot only 28% in the EuroLeague last season, and he shot only 60% from the free-throw line. Further, while he’s a decent athlete, he’ll struggle to secure a role in the NBA. He’s going to need to add speed to stay with modern wings, and he’ll also have to bulk up to bang with power forwards.

Still, Avdija’s upside is alluring. He’s only 19, and his smarts, confidence and grittiness should provide him cover for much of his rookie season. Avdija should be the first small forward off of the board.

Isaac Okoro, Auburn – 19 years old

Avdija might be the flashier name currently, but Okoro will give him a run for his money in terms of which small forward is first off the board. Okoro is built like a traditional NBA wing; he’s 6-foot-6 with good strength packed in his muscular frame (215 lbs). Okoro finishes well around the rim and he converts well through contact. He’s an exceptional athlete who excels catching the ball on the move. Like Avdija, Okoro has the poise and composure of a more experienced player. Also, like Avdija, Okoro looked the part of a high IQ player in his lone season at Auburn.

And while all that is great, the main allure of Okoro is his defense. He’s a fairly advanced defender given his age, and his athleticism and timing make him an effective weak side help defender.

While Okoro’s raw abilities are exquisite, his refined offensive skills leave something to be desired. Okoro shot 28 percent on three-point field goals and he struggled from the free-throw line (67.2 percent). His mid-range jump shot also needs work, and he struggles in isolation situations.

If Okoro can hone his offensive game, he could grow into an All-Star. He has the ability to guard multiple positions, and his strength and athleticism give him a leg up on most prospects. But even if he doesn’t become an All-Star, he possesses a fairly high floor given his defensive abilities — and the guy definitely fills the state sheet (12.9 points, 4.4 rebounds, 2.0 assists, .9 steals and .9 blocks). He has lockdown defender potential and he’ll put his stamp on the game beginning on night one.

Devin Vassell, Florida State – 20 years old

Vassell played two seasons at Florida State, but he came into his own in his Sophomore season. He averaged 12.7 points, 5.1 rebounds, 1.6 assists, 1.4 steals and 1.0 blocks per game. He shot a more than respectable 41.5% on three-point attempts, and he demonstrated a strong stroke from the free-throw line (73.8 percent) and on two-point field goal attempts (53.2).

Vassell is an extremely athletic leaper, who can rise up for a highlight dunk and sprint down the floor with ease. He has good body control and demonstrated a strong mid-range game, especially his step-back jump shot. But Vassell must generate more free throws through decisive moves to the hoop, which would be bolstered by a more muscular frame. Additionally, he must improve his ball-handling to get more from isolations.

Vassell will have an adjustment period in terms of scoring the ball at the next level. Fortunately, his defense and shooting should get him by. If he can bulk up and improve his handling, Vassell could grow into a serious player.

Aaron Nesmith, Vanderbilt – 20 years old

Nesmith probably has a lower floor than any of the other top small forward prospects given that he’ll be 21 by the draft. Still, he looked quite good in his Junior year, averaging 23 points, 4.9 rebounds and 1.4 steals per game on a scorching 52.2 percent shooting from deep. Nesmith is an incredibly gifted shooter who has impressive range. His ability to catch-and-shoot and create space with fakes makes him a promising prospect – for the right team.

Nesmith is a high IQ player who uses his smarts on the defensive end. He’s also quite strong, can get buckets in the open floor and demonstrates above average ball-handling skills, as long as he’s not taking the ball to the hoop.

But there are inherent limitations in Nesmith’s game. He’s doesn’t create for his teammates too effectively and he turns the ball over more frequently than one would like with. Further, Nesmith is plagued by robotic movements that limit his athleticism. His ball-handling breaks down when taking the ball to the rack – something he’ll certainly have to work on in the NBA if he wants to be a versatile scoring threat against the bigger and stronger competition.

Still, Nesmith’s positives give him an excellent chance at being selected in the first round. His range alone will intrigue teams in need of a shooter.

Honorable Mentions:

Saddiq Bey, Villanova – 21 years old

Jaden McDaniels, Washington – 19 years old

Robert Woodard II, Mississippi State – 20 years old

With the uncertainty around small forward prospects, expect to see a revolving door of names enter the discussion after the first four wing prospects are off the board prior to Nov. 16 – assuming the draft is held then. But regardless of how you have them ranked, all of the aforementioned prospects have question marks. But all have had far more time to improve than they would have in years’ past. Let’s hope that shows come next season.

Continue Reading

NBA

NBA Daily: Opposite Plotlines for Today’s Matchups

With the two matchups going on today, Matt John examines the two teams who could be in the most trouble because of one of their individual stars for opposite reasons.

Matt John

Published

on

The second round of the NBA playoffs was hyped up to be one of the most entertaining we’ve had in years. So far, they haven’t fallen short of expectations. We knew that Houston and Los Angeles’ battle of opposite philosophies would make for some twists and turns. We knew that Boston and Toronto would duke it out in an Atlantic Division showdown. We knew that Miami would push Milwaukee to new heights. We didn’t really know if the Nuggets would give the Clippers a good series, but the fact that they have so far has made an intense postseason all the more gripping.

Anyway, today we’re getting two games from two series in completely opposite places. The Lakers and the Rockets will face off for the series lead, while the HEAT will try to finish off the Bucks once and for all. Below, we’re going to focus on two teams who have an individual star that either may be more flawed than we thought or one that may not be as flawed as we thought.

Bucks vs. HEAT: Giannis is great and all, but…

We all pretty much knew this was going to be a good series. We did not expect this.

The buzz surrounding Bucks v. HEAT was that Miami was going to make Milwaukee earn every win they got in this series. If that was the plan, then Miami has failed miserably, because until Khris Middleton went supernova on them on Sunday, Milwaukee had come up terribly short.

Let’s first give Miami the credit that they are due and more. With Bam Adebayo and Jimmy Butler alone, Miami was going to be a tough matchup for Milwaukee – but to see the Bucks all but roll over in this series is an unpleasant sight. Acquiring Jae Crowder and Andre Iguodala has paid huge dividends and it’s showing. There are other factors involved, but Miami’s defensive efforts have limited Giannis to 21.8 points a game and that’s played a role in the HEAT being in the driver’s seat of this series.

Speaking of Giannis Antetokounmpo, this series has not been a good look for the Defensive Player of the Year. Especially since it looks like his second consecutive MVP (presumably) is right around the corner. So, to see both him and Milwaukee, once an unstoppable force without an immovable object in sight, get stopped by a sturdy but not immovable squad is saddening.

Nearly a year ago, Basketball Insiders compared these current Bucks to the Dwight Howard-led Orlando Magic from the late-2000’s/early 2010’s. To oversimplify things, both were contenders led by a superstar with a rare physique that made them tough to stop. To put the superstar in the best position, they surrounded them with playmakers and three-point shooters.

While the teams’ roster constructions weren’t exactly the same, their strengths as a team certainly were. Now we’re seeing the Bucks’ flaws just as we did the Magic 10 years ago. If you have the personnel to make the lone superstar uncomfortable, the team doesn’t function as well.

Giannis is near impossible to stop, but the one major flaw is that if you take away his ability to drive and force him into a jumper, he loses his rhythm. Even if his shot is on – never a guarantee – his opponents will let him beat them that way until he makes them pay. Hardly any team can pick on this, but the HEAT are one of them, and now they’re one win away from their first Eastern Conference Finals since LeBron James took his talents out of South Beach.

This ultimately is what puts Antetokounmpo below the likes of LeBron James and Kawhi Leonard for now. Those guys are rare physical specimens like him, but their elite games don’t revolve entirely around their natural gifts as he does or Dwight did. At 25 years old, there’s plenty of time for him to change that and, for all we know, he will, but to see him struggle at a time when the conference was supposed to run through him has ignited tons of questions.

Milwaukee’s technically not out yet, but they’ve shown their mortality against Miami. If this really is it for them, then they’ve got to find a quick fix for this problem because if they don’t, then the unspeakable may happen.

Lakers vs. Rockets: Westbrook has been bad and all but…

Shaking off the rust and recovering from a balky knee would be tough for anyone. For Russell Westbrook, it’s killing his productivity and, in turn, the Rockets’ playoff chances. He’s averaging 15.6 points on 39/16/47 splits with a most recent 10-point, 4-of-15 effort from the field which included seven turnovers and air balling wide-open threes sticking out like a sore thumb.

It also doesn’t help that he’s playing the Lakers of all teams. When Westbrook has been in, the Lakers have taken advantage of his shortcomings offensively and it shows both on the court and the stat line.

Most of Westbrook’s damage is hurting Houston on the offensive end. With the All-Star guard in the game, Houston is minus-13.7 with him on the court, the worst offensive rating on the team. The 12 turnovers he’s coughed up in this series probably have something to do with that.

With Westbrook’s struggles and his predecessor Chris Paul coming off of his best individual season since 2016, this, of course, has led to many second-guessing the swap last summer. Or let’s rephrase that: People have been second-guessing that trade since the moment it was announced and, in light of recent events, they’re piling on now more than ever.

Maybe they’re right. Even after playing in the NBA for over a decade now, Westbrook still hasn’t proven that he can control himself enough to reach his potential as a team player. We’ve seen glimpses. On the other hand, Paul showed that he can still pick apart defenses while holding his own on that end.

But replacing Paul with Westbrook was Harden’s idea. He didn’t want to play with Paul anymore and chose to play with one of his closest friends. You may think that the better fit is what’s best for the team, but we’ve seen the damage that can happen when your team’s best players have friction with one another. It hurt Utah this season. It hurt Boston last season. It destroyed the Lakers back in 2013. There’s no telling what it could have done to Houston this season.

Besides, we know that as bad as Westbrook has been, he’s capable of being better. Not a knockdown shooter, not even an efficient scorer, but he has done better in the past when the focus was on him. The more days he takes to shake off the rust from his knee, the more optimistic the Rockets ought to be.

The Rockets have to take the glass-half-full on this one because they don’t really have a choice otherwise.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Online Betting Site Betway
Advertisement
American Casino Guide
NJ Casino
NJ Casino

NBA Team Salaries

Advertisement

CloseUp360

Insiders On Twitter

NBA On Twitter

Trending Now