Connect with us

NBA

NBA Daily: The Legend Of Bobby Sura

As a Hawk, Bob Sura chased triple-doubles with nothing to lose. It’s different for the modern Hawks.

Buddy Grizzard

Published

on

A week from Thursday will mark the 14th anniversary of one of the most legendary performances in NBA history. As the clock wound down in a meaningless blowout over the playoff-bound New Jersey Nets, Atlanta Hawks guard Bob Sura sought to become the first player in seven years to record a triple-double in three consecutive games. Egged on by teammates, Sura threw the ball off the backboard to intentionally miss a layup so he could collect his 10th rebound.

The NBA later rescinded it, ruling that since Sura hadn’t made a legitimate shot attempt, it couldn’t be counted as a rebound. His final stat line included 22 points, 11 assists and nine rebounds. It left Sura as a footnote in history, both as an infamous triple-double seeker, and for his impact on the Hawks’ position in the 2004 NBA Draft Lottery.

To appreciate Sura’s magical half-season in Atlanta, we rewind to February of 2004 when the Hawks unloaded recently-acquired forward Rasheed Wallace to the Detroit Pistons for Chris Mills, Sura and a first round pick Atlanta turned into high schooler Josh Smith that summer. The transaction grew out of an earlier salary dump in which the Hawks sent Shareef Abdur-Rahim, Theo Ratliff and Dan Dickau to the Portland Trail Blazers for the expiring contracts of Wallace and Wesley Person.

Abdur-Rahim was owed $28 million and Ratliff $21 million over two seasons for a Hawks team that was up against the luxury tax despite the league’s fourth-worst record. Dispatching Abdur-Rahim also ended a sad Hawks era that followed the disastrous decision to trade the draft rights to future Hall of Famer Pau Gasol to obtain him.

Former Hawks PR director Arthur Triche said he believed Atlanta never intended to keep Wallace.

“What this does is accelerate the process of rebuilding,” Hawks GM Billy Knight told the Associated Press at the time. “This was a deal that gets us financially healthy and makes us a player in the free-agent market.”

With that goal in mind, Wallace was sent to the Pistons, where he would win an NBA championship the same season, while the Bob Sura Era commenced in Atlanta. Sura concluded his partial season with the Hawks with 20 games scoring in double-digits in 27 appearances. That included 32 points, eight rebounds, and five assists in an April 2 win over an Orlando Magic team that would finish with the league’s worst record and ultimately win the first overall pick, which it used to draft Atlanta native Dwight Howard.

Three games later, Sura notched a triple-double in a win over the Chicago Bulls, followed by another in a win over the Celtics before falling short against the Nets. That made Sura a significant contributor to the Hawks winning four of its final seven games to finish with a 28-54 record identical to the L.A. Clippers. The Hawks went 10-19 after obtaining him.

Which brings us to Sura’s true lasting impact on the Hawks organization. Just over a year after his final game for the Hawks, Sura would play his final NBA game as a member of the Houston Rockets. He wasn’t a part of Atlanta’s long-term plans … or any other team’s. But when the Hawks tied the Clippers for the fourth-worst record, it put Atlanta in a precarious position in the NBA Draft Lottery.

The expansion Charlotte Bobcats, now the Charlotte Hornets, were set to enter the league in the 2004-05 season and were assigned the fourth pick in the draft. This meant that any team that failed to gain a top-three position via the lottery would pick no higher than fifth.

The Magic held the best odds with a 25 percent chance at the first overall pick and a 64 percent chance to stay in the top three. Orlando won the right to pick first, then the Clippers crashed the top three by moving up to pick second. Since the Hawks finished tied with the Clippers, the two teams split the 209 winning lottery combinations the fourth and fifth-worst teams would normally have.

Per NBA rules, since the number of combinations was uneven, a coin flip gave 105 combinations to the Clippers and 104 to the Hawks. That coin flip would have also given the Clippers the higher pick in the event that neither the Hawks nor the Clippers moved into the top three. As fate would have it, one of those combinations moved the Clippers up to the second slot. The Bulls, with the second-worst record, won the right to pick third.

Among teams with the three worst records, the Wizards were victimized by L.A.’s move up. When Washington failed to secure a top-three pick, it tumbled all the way to fifth thanks to the Bobcats’ pre-assigned fourth position. That dropped the Hawks to sixth. Had the Hawks lost only one more game, Atlanta would have held a 38 percent chance to land in the top three while the Clippers’ odds dropped to 29 percent.

That’s not to blame Atlanta’s historic ineptitude in the draft on Bob Sura. Roland Beech of 82games.com evaluated team performance in the NBA Draft from 1989 to 2008 and determined that the Hawks were tied with the Knicks for worst return on expected value. In the 2004 NBA Draft, Atlanta had the chance to select 3-and-D pioneers such as Luol Deng, who went to the Bulls with the seventh pick, and Andre Iguodala, who went ninth to the 76ers. Instead, the Hawks selected broken-shot journeyman Josh Childress with the sixth pick. Atlanta would select Marvin Williams over Chris Paul and Deron Williams with the second pick the next year.

But Sura’s blaze of glory in Atlanta does faintly echo through the events of Sunday evening. The modern-day Hawks defeated the Orlando Magic, owners of the league’s fourth-worst record, 94-88 behind a career-high and Bob Sura-esque 19 points from rookie wing Tyler Dorsey. The Hawks entered the game tied with the Memphis Grizzlies for the league’s second-worst record. The win draws Atlanta even with the Magic with 22 wins while the Hawks remain a half-game lower in the overall standings with 55 losses to Orlando’s 54.

The Hawks jumped to the NBA’s third-toughest remaining schedule behind only the Lakers and Thunder once Sunday’s games became final. Memphis has the 15th-hardest remaining schedule, Orlando is 18th and the Phoenix Suns 19th. All five of Atlanta’s remaining games are against teams in playoff position while the Magic have three remaining against teams eliminated from the playoffs, the Suns two and the Grizzlies one.

In other words, had the Hawks lost to the Magic Sunday, they would have been in position to potentially lose their final five games. That would have left Atlanta with an outcome no worse than a tie with Memphis for the second-worst record and a split of lottery combinations like the Hawks had with the Clippers in 2004.

Through a buyout of out Ersan Ilyasova’s contract in February, the Hawks avoided a repeat of the mistake it made with Sura in 2004. Ilyasova had the second-best net rating among Hawks with at least 1000 minutes this season. Since he wasn’t in Atlanta’s long term plans, the team released him and allowed him to join a 76ers team that is ready to win now.

Since the NBA fined Mavericks owner Mark Cuban $600,000 in February for publicly stating a desire for his team to lose games to improve lottery position, the Hawks have beaten the playoff-bound Pacers and Jazz. Perhaps unwisely, the Hawks have also beaten the Suns and Magic in games that could impact the final NBA Draft order.

No one can question the Hawks’ will to win. But unlike the legendary Bob Sura, many of the Hawks who played Sunday are under contract beyond this season. Sura could chase triple-doubles with a carefree attitude since he was nearing the end of his career. The young Hawks could see the team’s future winning potential dramatically effected by where the team lands in this summer’s NBA Draft.

Buddy Grizzard has written for ESPN.com and BBallBreakdown and served as an editor for ESPN TrueHoop Network.

Advertisement




Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NBA

The Problem With ‘Championship Or Bust’

Should an NBA Title be the only measuring stick when we’re talking about a team’s success?

Spencer Davies

Published

on

In this day and age, there’s a constant need for instant gratification. It goes for everything, really, but especially for sports.

Before the 2017-18 NBA season kicked off, the general outlook on the league was that the regular season would be a waste of time. People dubbed the Golden State Warriors as clear-cut repeat champions. Other then that franchise, there were maybe one or two others that could put up a fight with such a juggernaut.

While that story has yet to play out, others are developing quickly.

The all-of-a-sudden dangerous New Orleans Pelicans are the only ball club to have advanced to the second round of the playoffs as the sixth seed in the Western Conference. LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers are deadlocked in a tied series with an Indiana Pacers team that everybody seemed to believe was lottery-bound before the year began.

After falling nine games under .500 in late January, the Utah Jazz have caught fire and are up two games to one against the league’s reigning league MVP and a re-constructed Oklahoma City Thunder roster. We’d be remiss to leave out the sensational play of Ben Simmons and Joel Embiid as the Philadelphia 76ers continue to show how dominant they’ve been in a hard-hitting affair with a gritty Miami Heat bunch.

The start to this postseason trumps last season’s already. There is a competitive fire within the majority of these encounters. It’s all on the line to prove who will be the best of the best.

And having said that, there can only be one that takes home the Larry O’Brien trophy.

One. That’s it. In the last 18 years, there have been a total of eight different organizations that have earned the right to call themselves champions. All things considered, it’s not that many.

But there’s a giant misconception about parity in the NBA that needs to be thwarted.

This league is filled with talent, top to bottom. Just like in any sport, you have the basement dwellers still trying to right the ship. Whether it be coaching, injuries, or inexperience—they’re attempting to find their way. That’s why those players are sitting at home in late April.

Then there are those who are not merely spectators, but are involved in the remaining field of 15 teams (sorry, Portland Trail Blazers). Of course, in their minds, there is a common goal of winning a title, as it should be.

However, is it fair to quantify the success of every one of these franchises simply based on whether they accomplish that goal or not? Heck no.

Are we supposed to just forget about the progress made from end-to-end? What if — hear this out — both teams have talent and one just beat the other?

Building championship basketball takes patience. There has to be some semblance of playoff experience involved. Continuity is a must have. You might not want to hear it, but the postseason is where the seeds are planted, where the understanding of the stage really starts.

There can be a collection of young players who have been teammates for years, but have never taken part in the playoffs before. Sometimes there can be a team that’s full of veterans that have been there, but they may not have played together as a collective unit. Each one of them has a different background in a different setting.

It’s a whole different beast at this point. Some are so naive to see how elevated and intense the environment really is, so they assume a team that loses a few games isn’t championship material. Newsflash: Not one team in the history of the NBA has gone 16-0 in the playoffs.

And then, the ones who fall—whether it be in The Finals, conference finals, or in first two rounds—those organizations didn’t accomplish anything. Wrong, wrong, wrong.

So in this basketball world we live in where everything has to be a 20-point victory with zero losses and it’s “championship or bust” as the measuring stick, take a step back and appreciate the work it took to even get to the postseason.

Win or lose, many of these teams are building towards bigger things in the future. These experiences will make that clear in the years to come.

Continue Reading

NBA

NBA AM: Who’s the Next Donovan Mitchell?

Donovan Mitchell provided elite value at the back end of the lottery. Who might that player be this summer?

Joel Brigham

Published

on

The entire reason that so many non-playoff teams worked so diligently to blow their seasons was to get the best odds possible for the first overall selection in the 2018 NBA Draft. Watching LeBron James (a former first overall draft pick) do what he’s done to the league for the last 15 years, the desire to land a top pick is understandable. Ben Simmons, the heir apparent and likely Rookie of the Year, also was a first overall draft pick a couple of seasons ago.

In fact, of the 38 former first overall picks dating back to 1980, 28 of them would evolve into All-Stars, and it seems like only a matter of time before Simmons is added to that list, too. A higher percentage of top picks have been named All-Stars than any other slot in the draft. Numbers don’t lie. There is no pick more valuable than the very first one.

But…

Donovan Mitchell is good, too. Like, really good. He’s so good that there’s just as strong an argument for him as this season’s Rookie of the Year as there is for Simmons. Mitchell, though, was not a first overall pick. He was picked 13th, at the back end of the lottery.

He isn’t alone in landing elite value for teams picking outside of the lottery’s top half. Devin Booker was picked 13th in 2015. Giannis Antetokounmpo was the 15th selection in 2013. In 2011, Klay Thompson was picked 11th, while Kawhi Leonard was chosen with the 15th pick that same year. Paul George went 10th overall in 2010.

In other words, there are plenty of really good prospects every summer to give late-lottery teams hope. They might not generate the same hype as the guys vying for that top overall selection, but they’re also clearly a lot better than the tiers of players that start coming off the board in the 20s and 30s. All-Stars lurk in the 10-to-15 range of the draft, especially in a loaded class like the one we’re looking at this summer.

That begs the question: who is this year’s Donovan Mitchell?

Here are three possibilities:

Collin Sexton

Back in November, a series of unfortunate circumstances in a game against Minnesota led to a mass ejection of Alabama players that resulted in just three players being allowed to play the final ten minutes. Sexton was one of those three players and led a Crimson Tide rally despite the lopsided Minnesota power play. ‘Bama outscored the Gophers 30-22 in those final 10 minutes despite being down two players, and Sexton finished the game with 40 points. That’s how good he is.

Of course, he could slip in this draft if only because there are so many flashier names ahead of him. It appears as though seven players (DeAndre Ayton, Luka Doncic, Jaren Jackson, Marin Bagley, Michael Porter, Mo Bamba and Trae Young) likely will be drafted before him, which puts him in a category with guys like Mikal Bridges, Wendell Carter, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Miles Bridges, and Kevin Knox. Sexton probably will fall somewhere in that range, which means he would fall somewhere between the eighth and 13th pick.

He is competitive, charismatic and incredibly driven, so there’s a really good chance he does well in interviews and workouts and shows how elite he is. On the other hand, if he falls to the Sixers or Hornets or Clippers, some non-tanking team could end up with one of the biggest stars of the draft.

Miles Bridges

Coming into his sophomore season, Bridges was considered one of the top NBA prospects in college basketball, and while that is still true to a certain extent, his stock dropped a bit this past season while several players—including his teammate Jaren Jackson, Jr.—saw their own stocks rise.

Despite a minor loss in momentum, Bridges is one of the most NBA-ready players projected to be selected in the lottery. He’s still young enough to have a high ceiling, but he’s older and more physically mature than a lot of the other players vying to be drafted in his neck of the pecking order. He does nearly everything well, from ball handling to rebounding to shooting, and he can play both ends of the floor. His athleticism is his calling card, and that added to everything else he does well makes him a lock for some measure of NBA success.

He has his flaws, but he’s probably an All-Rookie First Teamer that will be selected after ten players that aren’t. That makes him a potential steal on the back-end of the lottery.

Jontay Porter

This time last year, Porter was a 17-year-old kid deciding whether or not to reclassify and play at the University of Missouri with his older brother Michael Porter, Jr. and under his father Michael Porter, Sr., who is a member of the coaching staff there. Obviously big bro is a high lottery pick, but the younger sibling was the 11th rated prospect in his high school class (the one with Zion Williamson and R.J. Barrett) before reclassifying.

He has declared for this summer’s draft but hasn’t yet hired an agent. If he stays in, he’ll be the youngest player in the draft, and mid-first round is where teams start gambling on the uber-young players with mountains of potential rather than older, more proven college players.

In Porter’s case, that could mean a mid-to-late first-round team ends up with a tremendous bargain, even if it takes him a few years to grow into himself. He’s 6-foot-11 but is incredibly smart and well-rounded on offense. He shoots threes (he hit 110 of them as a freshman at Mizzou), but he’s know for his vision and passing more than anything. That’s a modern-day stretch-four or stretch-five if ever there was one, and getting him a year before his time could be a way for a team to steal a deal in the middle of the first round.

With the playoffs in full swing, most observers are focused in on the battles for conference supremacy. For many of the NBA’s other teams, though, the draft preparation process has begun.

In short order, we’ll see which teams end up snagging the next Donovan Mitchell.

Continue Reading

NBA DAILY

NBA Daily: Pelicans Might Be Better Off Without DeMarcus Cousins

Without DeMarcus Cousins, Anthony Davis has excelled. It might not be a coincidence.

Moke Hamilton

Published

on

Forget Kawhi Leonard, the most interesting storyline of this NBA summer is going to be DeMarcus Cousins.

By now, if you’ve wondered whether the New Orleans Pelicans would be better off without the talented big man, you’re certainly not alone.

Just ask the Portland Trail Blazers.

On Saturday, the Pelicans pulled off an improbable sweep of the third-seeded Blazers in the first round of their best-of-seven playoff series. And while the immediate question that comes to mind is what to make of the Blazers, a similar question can be (and should be) asked of the Pelicans.

Without question, Cousins is one of the most gifted big men the NBA has sen in quite some time, but it shouldn’t be lost on any of us that Anthony Davis began to put forth superhuman efforts when Cousins was absent.

Ever heard the saying that too many cooks spoil the brew?

That may be pricisely the case here.

Sure, having good players at your disposal is a problem that most head coach in the league would sign up for, but it takes a special type of player to willingly cede touches and shots in the name of the best interests of the team.

We once had a similar conversation about Russell Westbrook and Kevin Durant, mind you. Those that recognized that Westbrook’s ball dominance and inefficiency took opportunities away from Durant to be the best version of himself once believed that the Oklahoma City Thunder would have been wise to pitch Westbrook to New Orleans back when Chris Paul was still manning their perimeter.

For what it’s worth, with Cousins in the lineup, he averaged 18 shots per game. In the 48 games he played this season, the Pelicans were 27-21. With him in the lineup, Davis shot the ball 17.6 times per game and scored 26.5 points per contest.

In the 34 games the Pelicans played without Cousins, Davis’ shot attempts increased fairly significantly. He got 21.9 attempts per contest and similarly increased his scoring output to 30.2 points per game.

Aside from that, Cousins’ presence in the middle made it a tad more difficult for Rajon Rondo and Jrue Holiday to have the pace and space they need to be most effective. With both Davis and Cousins, the Pelicans struggled to consistently string together wins. Without Cousins, they improbably became the first team in the Western Conference to advance to the second round.

That Cousins tore his achilles tendon and is just a few months from becoming an unrestricted free agent combine to make him the most interesting man in the NBA.

* * * * * *

With Chris Paul having decided that the grass was probably greener with James Harden and Mike D’Antoni than it was with Doc Rivers and Blake Griffin, the Clippers fulfilled his request to be trade to the Houston Rockets and re-signed Griffin to a five-year max. deal. In doing so, they both gave Griffin a stark reminder of what life in the NBA is like and provided a blueprint for teams to follow when they have a superstar player with whom they believe to have run their course.

The glass half full perspective might be that Davis has simply become a better, healthier, more effective player and that with Cousins, he would have another weapon that could help catapult the Pelicans ever further toward the top of the Western Conference. But the half-empty glass might yield another conclusion.

At the end of the day, although he still hasn’t appeared in a single playoff game, Cousins is regarded as a game-changing talent and is one of the few players available on the free agency market this summer that could justify an annual average salary of $30 million. In all likelihood, the Pelicans will re-sign him for a sum that approaches that, but that doesn’t mean it’s the best move.

In the end, the Clippers traded Griffin for Avery Bradley, Tobias Harris, Boban Marjanovic, a first round pick and a second round pick. All things considered, it was a great haul for the Clippers when you consider that, just a few months prior, they could have lost Griffin as a free agent and gotten nothing in return.

Remarkably, after seeing Griffin dealt to Detroit, in the Western Conference, the Pelicans are on a collision course with the Golden State Warriors. Their health a constant concern, the team will have to deal with the pesky perimeter defense of Holiday and Rondo and versatility and two-way effectiveness of Davis.

Nobody gave New Orleans a chance against Portland, and for sure, not many people are going to believe in their ability to score an upset over the defending champions. But believe it or not, New Orleans has become a different team. And they’ve done so without Cousins.

Indeed, believe it or not, the Clippers gave us a blueprint for what a team should do when it has a superstar who might not be the best long-term fit for their program.

And if the Pelicans were wise, they’d be smart to follow it.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

The Strictly Speaking Podcast

Advertisement

Trending Now