Don’t look now, but LaVar Ball’s plan is working.
Over the last year, the loud mouth and boisterous father of Chino Hills’ three Ball boys — Lonzo, LiAngelo and LaMelo — has consistently found himself in the news cycle staking one outrageous claim after another about the impending success of his sons’ future basketball careers.
LaVar’s oldest son, Lonzo, was the star player at UCLA last season. His breathtaking passing ability and on-court swagger catapulted his draft stock all the way to a second overall selection by his hometown Los Angeles Lakers in last June’s draft. But as Lonzo’s star continued to rise, LaVar was always nearby and ready to hop in front of a camera to make another bold claim.
When UCLA lost to Kentucky in the Sweet 16 of this past NCAA tournament, LaVar blamed the loss on the Bruins’ “three white guys” (Bryce Alford, T.J. Leaf and Thomas Welsh) “because the foot speed is too slow.”
And when Lonzo declared for the NBA Draft, LaVar demanded that any potential shoe company looking to sign his boy would need to co-brand with the Ball’s already pre existing company “Big Baller Brand.” After shoe companies opted to pass on LaVar’s offer, he gave Lonzo his own shoe, the ZO2 — the first of its kind under the Big Baller Brand.
As LaVar’s middle son, LiAngelo, gets set to play his freshman season at UCLA next year, there’s little doubt that his father will not quiet down. The youngest of the Ball brothers, LaMelo, is getting ready to hit his junior year of high school and is in full AAU mode right now as summer basketball is at a premium.
On Wednesday night in Las Vegas at the Adidas Uprising Summer Championships, LaVar’s Big Ballers team featuring LaMelo squared off in a highly anticipated event against SC Supreme, captained by 2018 No. 2 overall recruit Zion Williamson. On a Facebook Livestream, ran by BallisLife, 800,000 people logged on to view throughout the game. 800,000 people. For a high school basketball game. In July.
Like it or not, people are always willing to tune in just to see what LaVar might do next.
NBA players Damian Lillard, Andrew Wiggins, Thon Maker, Jamal Murray, and of course, Lonzo, were on hand for the event. Because that’s what LaVar does. He turns basketball games into events. He turns any television appearance into an event. Anytime someone wants to put a rolling camera in front of LaVar’s face, it usually becomes an event.
When asked prior to the game Wednesday night if he and LaMelo could take on LeBron James and his son, the never-shy father made another big time claim.
LaVar Ball says he and LaMelo would take LeBron AND Jordan 😵 pic.twitter.com/2OrPvODzZR
— Overtime (@overtime) July 27, 2017
This is the same man who said that Michael Jordan wouldn’t be able to guard him in a one-on-one matchup.
For all of the outlandish comments, insane remarks and continued hubris ad nauseum, LaVar seems to be one of the most calculated sports parents and brand builders the game of basketball has ever seen.
In typical LaVar fashion, the man even made an appearance on WWE Monday Night RAW where he proceeded to rip his shirt off on live television. All for the love of the brand.
Wednesday night in Las Vegas wasn’t about two teenagers and their teams squaring off to play a game of basketball. Plenty of other games this summer featured much more on-court talent than the highlight reel searching LaMelo vs. Zion game. But that’s not what people were watching for. Eyes are drawn to LaVar because he consistently will do whatever he deems necessary to grow Big Baller Brand.
Considering this the highest watched high school basketball game since James was an amateur, who can argue with the results?
However, with all of the calamity that LaVar looks to createfor the sake of growing his brand, detractors of his method have arisen.
Back in March, Fox Sports 1’s Kristine Leahy made comments about LaVar’s parenting skills, questioning if the fathering of his sons, Lonzo in particular, was rooted in fear.
“All three sons, they’re being forced to do it,” Leahy said on FS1. “They’re being told, ‘You will start basketball at age six,’ just like Lonzo told us. And whenever you asked him a question, I think [Lonzo] said, what, five words? He looks terrified whenever he’s talking. He looks genuinely afraid.”
As a result, when LaVar appeared on The Herd with Colin Cowherd back in May, he refused to even look Leahy in the eye, and advised her to “stay in your lane.” This caused a media frenzy, and a collective questioning of LaVar’s character and treatment towards women.
Bottom line though, all it did was generate more conversation about the Ball family, with the culmination of interest coming Wednesday night where everyone even remotely interested in hoops tuned in a little after midnight eastern to see a few kids play unorganized basketball mainly because of the loud guy on the sidelines.
Two days later, at the same tournament, LaVar delivered another patented episode that continues to control the sensationalized nature of the news cycle. In a matchup against Team BBC, LaVar was issued a technical foul by a female referee. But, in a surprising turn of events, it was the referee who was removed from the game. Not the loud mouth dad. LaVar threatened to remove his team from the game if the referee switch wasn’t made. Even after a successful swap, LaVar still managed to receive a second technical, garnering an ejection. As a result, the coach pulled his players off the court before the end of the game.
Addressing the media after the fact, LaVar issue a familiar response to a detractor.
“She needs to stay in her lane because she ain’t ready for this,” LaVar told ESPN. “[Ref] the little kids first and then come up. Because she ain’t did enough. She ain’t got enough on her resume, I could tell.”
The moral of the story when it comes to LaVar’s public antics is that he’s figured out the system. He knows it. He’s just waiting for everyone else to figure out that they’re wrapped around his finger.
All it’s going to take for LaVar to continue to rise Big Baller Brand is the on-court success of his boys. And after Lonzo dominated the Las Vegas Summer League with multiple triple-doubles, the next step in his plan doesn’t seem too unrealistic of a goal.
When LaVar pulls his next crazy stunt, when he says the next outlandish comment, or when he pulls his AAU team off the court again, just remember, he knows exactly what he’s doing. And from all accounts, it’s working.
“Oh we got LaVar controlled,” LaVar said to media following Friday’s incident. “No. I got ya’ll controlled. Cause all I’m here is to watch my boys play. And people in the stands want to watch them play.”
The Lakers Have Finally Stabilized
After a tough five-year period filled with loss and disappointment, the Lakers have finally put themselves back in a position to succeed.
On paper, missing the playoffs for the fifth year in a row would rarely be considered impressive, but for the Los Angeles Lakers, a team that’s suffered pretty much nothing but misery over the last half-decade, this season was a sign of progress.
Leading up to this past season, the previous four years overall were anything but easy on the Lakers. Besides consistently being one of the worst teams in the league, some of the team’s high lottery picks, such as D’Angelo Russell, did not pan out as well as they had hoped, and management baffled the fanbase when they signed both Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov to approximately $140 million combined over four years.
This season, things finally took a turn for the better. The team’s youngest players, particularly Brandon Ingram, Kyle Kuzma, Julius Randle and Lonzo Ball, started to yield positive results. The team’s new acquisitions, specifically Brook Lopez, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and briefly Isaiah Thomas, made a notable impact on the season. Second-year head coach Luke Walton proved himself to be up for the job with improved personnel at his arsenal. That may have led to only 35 wins, but compared to the previous four seasons’ final results, 35 wins is about as good as the Lakers could have hoped for.
And it should only get better from here. The biggest positive is that the team’s long-term outlook is now the brightest its been since Dwight Howard skipped town in 2013. Their impending return to the glory days is still up in the air, but the Lakers can finally look forward to a promising future for two reasons.
When the Lakers replaced Mitch Kupchak with Rob Pelinka and Magic Johnson to run the team, the two of them went to work right away. Pelinka and Johnson knew that if the Lakers were going to attain relevance again, they had to undo the franchise’s previous mistakes, even if it meant getting rid of some of their young talent.
It’s as the old saying goes, “You can’t make an omelet without breaking some eggs.”
Making said omelet started with getting rid of their albatross contracts. The Lakers found a taker for Mozgov when they traded him to Brooklyn for Brook Lopez’s expiring deal, but that deal also required trading Russell. Mid-season, the Lakers found a taker for Jordan Clarkson when they traded him to Cleveland, but that deal also required trading Larry Nance Jr.
Losing Russell and Nance Jr, and to some degree Clarkson, may have been tough cheese to swallow, but with Mozgov and Clarkson off the payroll, the Lakers have a ton of cap space at their disposal. In fact, this summer, the Lakers have only $34.5 million in guaranteed contracts, which will be the lowest payroll in entire NBA. This is a much bigger deal now that it’s been in the past for one simple reason: Hardly any teams will have cap room this summer.
The NBA salary cap’s drastic rise in 2016 caused many teams to overshoot their mark over the past two off-seasons. Because of that, quite a few teams will be paying the luxury tax while others will do everything in their power to avoid the luxury tax. This means that only a select few teams will have cap room to add a free agent on a max deal. The Lakers, on the other hand, have the cap room to add two.
Their situation only gets better given the competition in free agency. Most of the other teams that have cap room are in rebuilding mode, so the Lakers shouldn’t expect many competitors in their chase for marquee free agents ie LeBron James and Paul George this summer. The only other team that will be competing for their services with available cap space is Philadelphia, who only has $44 million on payroll this summer. Houston will also be in the race, but they will have to get creative if they hope to add a max free agent this summer plus keep Chris Paul AND Clint Capela.
Even if the Lakers whiff on LeBron and George, it isn’t the end of the world. They can afford to re-sign Thomas and/or Caldwell-Pope to one-year deals worth over $10 million because hardly anyone else can do the same. Even if absolutely nothing goes their way this summer, they’ll have flexibility again next season. While having cap space does not automatically mean free agents will come to the Lakers’ door next season, it’s better to have money available to offer than having to spend it on Clarkson and Mozgov.
Promising Youth Movement
Many knew the Lakers’ young core was nothing to sneeze at, but for the first time since they’ve started their rebuild in 2013, their youth movement’s talent finally translated into wins. They didn’t do it all on their own, but nothing makes a team’s future brighter than their young players starting to reach their potential.
That starts with Brandon Ingram. Ingram was the textbook example of raw his rookie season, but his sophomore year, he started living up to his billing as the second overall pick in his draft. Across the board, he improved his numbers, but his shining moment came when the Lakers turned to him to run the point with Lonzo Ball out in late-January. During that stretch, the Duke alum averaged 18.4 points on 52 percent shooting including 46 percent from three, 5.4 assists, and 5.5 rebounds. Ingram struggled mightily with injuries after that, but his vast improvement should be very beneficial in the long run.
Then there was the biggest surprise of the season: Kyle Kuzma. When the deal was first agreed to, Kuzma was originally a throw-in when the Lakers traded Mozgov and Russell for Lopez, but knowing Brooklyn’s luck, Kuzma may wind up being the best player in this deal. Kuzma wowed the fans at the Staples Center, as he averaged 16.1 points and 6.3 rebounds while shooting 45 percent from the field. Since Kuzma is only 22 years old, there’s no telling what his ceiling might be.
Then there’s the first lottery pick the Lakers drafted in their rebuild: Julius Randle. Randle got himself in the best shape of his life in preparation for this season, and it paid off on the court. Randle averaged career-highs in both point average (16.1) and field goal percentage (58 percent), but his best stretch came in February through March. In that time, Randle averaged 21.2 points on 57.6 percent shooting, 9.5 rebounds, and 3.3 assists. Randle is a restricted free agent this year, but with the lack of available money this summer, his best option may be to stay in LA.
Finally, the biggest wild card of the Lakers’ young talent: Lonzo Ball. Ball was both injury-riddled and inconsistent his rookie year, but he showed flashes every now and again of the player his humble father said he would be. While he had his issues putting the ball in the bucket, Ball’s much-hyped passing translated in the NBA, averaging 7.2 assists a game, and his rebounding was terrific given his size, as he averaged 6.9 rebounds a game. The jury is still out on Ball, but he should be given a full season before anyone comes to judgment.
In short, the Lakers’ cap flexibility and promising youth movement give them stability that not many believed they would have had at the end of last season. Inadequacy and incompetence have plagued the Lakeshow for the past several years, but now that they’ve brought the right people aboard, they are now pointed in the right direction.
NBA Daily: Meet Chimezie Metu, A Versatile Big Man
Chimezie Metu could end up being one of the steals of this year’s draft.
Each year when it comes to the NBA draft, there always seems to a few players flying under the radar a bit. Players who are underrated or overlooked for whatever reason. This year, one of those players is Chimezie Metu from the University of Southern California.
In early mock drafts, Metu was projected to go anywhere from mid to late first-round. In some of the more recent mocks, he’s fallen out of the first-round altogether and into the second-round. If those projections hold and he does end up being selected in the second-round, then some team is going to get a huge steal.
Metu is a versatile big man who impacts both ends of the floor. He is an agile shot blocker who can control the paint defensively, and on the other end, he can score in the post while being able to step out and knock down mid-range jump shots. He is confident in what he’ll be able to bring to an NBA team.
“I think being versatile and being able to make an impact on defense right away,” Metu told reporters at the NBA Draft Combine this past week. “Being able to switch on to smaller players or guard the post, and just being able to knock down shots or make plays when I’m called upon.”
In his three years at USC, Metu blossomed into one of the best players in the Pac-12 conference. This past season, he led a solid Trojans team in scoring with 15.7 points per game on 52.3 percent shooting. He also led the team in rebounding with 7.4 per game and had a team-high 59 blocked shots.
He’s taken note of some of the best big men in the NBA, some of whom he’s tried to model his game after. He told reporters at the combine that some of his biggest influences are Anthony Davis, Karl-Anthony Towns and Joel Embiid. He knows that there may be misconceptions about his game, or those that doubt him, but he isn’t worried about that at all.
“I don’t really worry about what other people are saying about myself. I just go out there and play hard, and try to help my team win games,” Metu said. “My strength is being versatile, being able to impact the game in multiple ways. Not being one dimensional and being able to have fingerprints on different parts of the game.”
It’s been busy past few days for Metu. He’s had 13 interviews with NBA teams to go along with workouts, medical testing and media availability. Although it’s been a hectic time, part of what has made it so worthwhile is all of the NBA personnel he’s been able to interact with. What really has stood out to him being at the combine is the difference between college and the NBA.
“I can just go up to the owners and the GMs and just talk to them,” Metu said. “Coming from college you basically have to act like they’re not there, cause of the rules and stuff. Just the fact that they can come up and talk to you, you can talk to them, that’s probably the most surprising part for me.”
Aside from all the front office personnel he’s interacted with, Metu has also had the opportunity to meet with some of the most respected names in NBA history. Among the former players who he’s had a chance to meet with, Magic Johnson and Bob McAdoo have definitely stood out to him.
While he’s grateful just to have been able to meet NBA royalty, he’s used it as an opportunity to pick their brains. He’s also been able to showcase his game in front of them. He is confident that he’s been able to impress them and hopefully make an impact on their decisions come draft night.
“Just coming out here and having fun, there’s a lot of basketball royalty,” Metu said. “Being able to get a chance to shake their hands, being able to take stuff from them and what helped them become great. I’m just trying to take their advice. It feels great because never in a million years did I think I’d be here. It’s fun just going out there and showing what I can do.”
The Case for Upperclassmen in the NBA Draft
College upperclassmen are becoming increasingly viable options in the NBA Draft, writes David Yapkowitz.
Each year when the NBA draft comes around, there seems to be an aversion to taking upperclassman with a top selection. More specifically, it’s college seniors who often find themselves getting drafted in the second-round if at all.
It can be understandable. NBA teams are clearly looking for a home run pick with a lottery selection. They’re looking for a player who they can build a foundation around for years to come. College seniors often project as solid role players to strengthen a team once that foundational superstar is already in place.
However, recent years have seen the entire first round dominated almost entirely by freshmen and sophomores. In 2017, a college senior wasn’t drafted until the San Antonio Spurs took Derrick White with the 29th pick. The Los Angeles Lakers followed that up with Josh Hart. Hart ended up having a better rookie season than a few of the underclassmen taken ahead of him.
A few other upperclassmen, Frank Mason III, a senior, and Dillon Brooks, a junior, both had better rookie seasons than many of the freshmen taking before them as well. Junior Semi Ojeleye is playing a major role for the Boston Celtics who are in the Eastern Conference Finals.
In 2016, Malcolm Brogdon, another college senior, was taken in the second-round with the 36th pick by the Milwaukee Bucks. He went on to win the Rookie of the Year award and was a starter for a playoff team.
Senior Tyrone Wallace was taken with the last pick in the draft at No. 60 that year. When a rash of injuries hit the Los Angeles Clippers this season, Wallace stepped in right away as a starter at times and helped keep the team afloat in the playoff picture.
There were a few college seniors that went undrafted in 2016, players such as Fred VanVleet Yogi Ferrell that have had better NBA careers to this point that a lot of the underclassmen taken ahead of them.
This isn’t to say that NBA teams should completely abandon taking young, underdeveloped players in the first-round. The Spurs took Dejounte Murray, a freshman point guard, over Brogdon, Wallace, VanVleet and Ferrell. That’s worked out well for them. It’s more a testament to having a good front office and scouting team than anything else.
But maybe NBA teams should start expanding their horizons when it comes to the draft. There appears to be a stigma of sorts when it comes to upperclassmen, particularly college seniors. If a guy can play, he can play. Of course, college production is often not the best means of judging NBA success, but it does count for something.
With the 2018 NBA draft about one month away, there are a few interesting names to look at when it comes to college seniors. Players such as Devonte’ Graham from Kansas, Theo Pinson from North Carolina, Chandler Hutchinson from Boise State, Jevon Carter from West Virginia and Bonzie Colson from Notre Dame are all guys that should be on NBA team’s radars.
Sure, none of those guys are going to turn into a superstar or even an All-Star. But you’re probably going to get a player that becomes a solid contributor for years to come.
Again, it’s understandable when teams take projects in the lottery. After a long season of losing, and in some cases years of losing, ownership and the fanbase are hungry for results. They don’t want a top pick to be used on a player that projects as only a solid contributor.
But after the lottery, the rest of the draft gets a little murky. A good front office will find an NBA caliber player whether he’s a freshman or a senior. The NBA Draft isn’t an exact science. Nothing is ever for sure and no player is guaranteed to become the player they’re projected to be.
College upperclassmen tend to be more physically developed and mentally mature for the NBA game. If what you’re looking for is someone who will step right in and produce for a winning team, then instead of wasting a pick on the unknown, it might be better to go with the sure thing.