Connect with us

NBA

NBA Sunday: The Kyrie Irving Quandary

Will Kyrie Irving be able to fulfill his promise playing as the Robin to LeBron James’ Batman?

Moke Hamilton

Published

on



When Kobe Bryant began playing basketball at the ripe young age of three, what do you think he dreamed of?

When, at the age of 10 years old, he began dissecting film of some of his predecessors, what do you think he imagined for himself?

Do you think Bryant hoped to merely be renowned as the Robin to Shaquille O’Neal, one of the most dominant centers the league has even seen?

Or, do you think Bryant dreamed of one day being known as the greatest player that has ever lived?

What do you think Kyrie Irving dreams of?

Do you think, as a fourth grader living in New Jersey after Irving had fallen in love with the game, that his central aspiration was to one day serve as the sidekick to arguably the greatest player to ever play the game?

Or, do you think he himself dreamed of one day being the greatest player to ever play the game?

A better question may be whether Irving will ever get the respect that he hopes to earn and leave the legacy he wants to leave by being the Tony Parker to LeBron James’ Tim Duncan.

This is the Kyrie quandary, and this edition of the NBA Sunday is merely examining his potential and promise through the lens of the two aforementioned superstars who have lived similar situations already, though they have taken diverging routes.

——

Back in the summer of 1996, with the Los Angeles Lakers wallowing in mediocrity, then general manager Jerry West effectively struck the basketball lottery jackpot. Amazingly, one year removed from a run to the 1995 NBA Finals, West convinced the already-established Shaquille O’Neal to accept a seven-year, $120 million contract to spurn the Orlando Magic and take his talents to Los Angeles.

This came on the heels of the Lakers acquiring an 18-year-old Kobe Bryant from the Charlotte Hornets.

Despite entering the league as the number one high school player in the nation, Bryant’s true potential on the NBA level was difficult to ascertain. He played all five positions during his high school years and was mostly regarded as a high-flying athletic wing upon his entry into the NBA.

It took Bryant two full years to become the team’s starting shooting guard, but after turning in some powerful performances and impressing the likes of West and coach Del Harris with his work ethic and confidence, Bryant would eventually supplant Eddie Jones.

Despite having copious amounts of talent, the Lakers were never seriously able to contend for an NBA championship until the arrival of Phil Jackson in July 1999.

With the implementation of the triangle offense, Jackson featured O’Neal as the primary offensive option with Bryant as his secondary. Operating out of the pinch-post and low box, O’Neal created looks and opportunities for his teammates, including Bryant. The formula was an obvious success, as the Lakers managed to win three straight NBA championships in 2000, 2001 and 2002.

That O’Neal would be named the NBA Finals MVP in all three series was not only unsurprising, it was both predictable and proper. O’Neal, the centi-millionaire, was West’s prized acquisition, the center of Jackson’s offense and the primary option.

He was, in a word, Batman. Kobe was Robin.

As the years progressed, egos clashed. For O’Neal, complacency set in. His work ethic deteriorated as his weight escalated. Bryant, who was probably a bit envious of the accolades and credit that O’Neal had gotten for his role as the centerpiece, quietly fumed.

Where there’s smoke, there’s fire, and that fire ultimately led to Bryant making a decision that would completely alter the course of his career and his legacy.

In essence, in the summer of 2004, after O’Neal and Bryant played in their fourth NBA Finals in five years, Bryant chose the uncertainty of pursuing his own destiny over continuing to thrive as the Robin to O’Neal’s Batman.

Shaq had fallen out of favor with the Lakers’ front office and, wielding an immense amount of power by virtue of being a free agent, Bryant could have helped smooth things over between the Lakers and O’Neal. Instead, he sat by idly as O’Neal was traded to the Miami HEAT for Brian Grant, Caron Butler and Lamar Odom. He did so partially out of the want to be a good company man, but also because he believed that he was better than being second fiddle to anybody and he wanted to prove that he could win without O’Neal.

Bryant was correct, and his stubborn belief in himself has made all the difference in the world.

Now, two championships later, Bryant is regarded by most people as, at the very least, the second-best shooting guard to ever play the game. He is considered by many to be the best Laker of all-time and by some, one of the top 10 players in history.

There is no way Bryant would have ever been regarded in that light by us if he could not win without O’Neal. Whether to take the opportunity to do so was a quandary of his own, but it is a quandary that Kyrie Irving may one day face.

Ten years from now, even if Irving accomplishes great things alongside LeBron James as a member of the Cleveland Cavaliers, how do you think history will remember him?

For that answer, look no further than Tony Parker.

——

It seems that since July 2003, Tony Parker has been searching for the respect he deserves, and 11 years later, his search still persists.

Even after admirably steering the San Antonio Spurs to the 2003 NBA championship, the Spurs, armed with cap space, attempted to sign Jason Kidd away from his New Jersey Nets. At the time, the decision to go after Kidd was questionable, to say the least.

In Parker, the Spurs seemed to have a neophyte who, at the young age of 21 years old, was already a championship contributor thanks to a decorated international career that began at the age of 16 for Paris Basket Racing.

Now, as the Spurs have accomplished some dynastic feats, Parker’s four championship rings are more than Derrick Rose, Rajon Rondo, Chris Paul, Russell Westbrook, Stephen Curry, John Wall and Damian Lillard combined.

Yet still, many, if not all of the aforementioned point guards would be mentioned among the game’s greatest before Parker.

Why is that? Is it because it’s true? Or is it because Parker’s greatness is hidden alongside the greatness of Tim Duncan?

Certainly, without Duncan, Parker would probably not have those four championship rings, but how many of the four that the duo won together would have been won if not for the Frenchman?

Parker is the quintessential inlier. One of this generation’s best point guards goes largely overlooked and unnoticed as he continues on about his business, secretly being one of the most consistent forces behind one of the league’s most consistent winners.

I have had multiple conversations with Parker about this very thing, the most recent being during the 2014 NBA Finals. In short, Parker is unconcerned with how history remembers him or the legacy that he leaves on the game. When it is all said and done, he will be considered, with Dirk Nowitzki, as one of the top European basketball players in history, but not one of the greatest point guards in history.

Parker is okay with that, though, because the fire that burned inside of Bryant to walk away and leave a legacy on the game, at large, simply isn’t there for Parker, and that is not a bad thing.

It’s just a fact.

But, deep down inside, if there is a raging inferno in the gut of a young superstar, that’s something that should be respected. All too often, though, as a collective culture, we view it as “selfish”—the worst thing you can call a basketball player.

What’s wrong with wanting to both win big and be the primary reason why your team does so? Why not strive to have your cake and eat it, too?

Kyrie’s quandary, and one that the Cavaliers will deal with at some point, is whether he, like Bryant, believes or will believe that he is better than being anyone’s Robin, or if he, like Parker, is willing to forgo an attempt at an independent legacy in pursuit of collecting rings.

——

In today’s NBA, winning is quite difficult. It takes three to tango, at the very least, and the recent examples of the “No I in Team” 2008 Boston Celtics and the recently disbanded Miami HEAT attest to this.

The assembling of those 2008 Celtics was just the beginning of the modern NBA talent arms race and led to the culmination of it—James and Chris Bosh joining the HEAT.

Sacrifice is a thing that is so often discussed as it relates to winning, whether it be money, touches, shots or ego. All six of Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, Kevin Garnett, James, Wade and Bosh had to sacrifice for their teams to win, so they are shining examples.

But each of those examples were at different places in their career than Irving is now.

Pierce, Allen, Garnett and Bosh had never come close to winning a championship, despite multiple All-Star appearances and being renowned as top-notch players. But by the time those unions were formed, all six players had already tirelessly toiled in pursuit of a championship that hadn’t come, and pulling the plug on their own individual legacies and willingly joining forces was a last straw that made sense after countless fruitless pursuits.

That, at this point, is not Irving’s situation.

Irving, at just 22 years old, is one of the more impressive point guard prospects to enter the league in recent memory. Despite just having 11 games of college experience at Duke University, Irving has impressed everyone with his poise and skill set. That was never more apparent than this past summer when he helped the Americans win the gold medal at the FIBA World Cup in Spain and was named the Most Valuable Player of the tournament.

There are still some appreciable holes in his game, but before joining with James, it was far too early to know with any certainty that Irving was more Gilbert Arenas than he was Isiah Thomas.

Now, depending on how things play out, he may never get the opportunity to provide the answer.

Back in the summer of 2012, though, Irving certainly let everyone know how highly he thought of himself.

Back then, Irving had just completed his rookie year and was invited to Las Vegas by the U.S. Men’s National Basketball team. Irving was invited as a member of the Select Team—the junior varsity practice squad that was assembled in furtherance of creating a funnel for players to adapt and become integrated with the international basketball scene.

Famously, there, Irving was caught on camera, arrogantly challenging none other than Kobe Bryant to a game of one-on-one.

“This is not a high school kid coming up to you and saying ‘Oh my God, Kobe, Kobe,’ this is me, coming up to you, one-on-one,” Irving said as Bryant chuckled and Irving suggested the two wager $50,000 on the competition.

“You have to guard,” Irving said to Bryant after Kobe told the rookie that there was no way he could stop Bryant from scoring.

Irving’s response?

“You’re not gonna lock me up.”

And when Kobe reminded Irving that he was not far removed from being “a high school kid,” Irving responded by telling Bryant that some players need 30 games in college to get ready for the NBA.

But Irving? According to him, he only needed 11.

So back in 2012, when LeBron was coming off of his first championship as a member of the HEAT, Irving knew he was ready for a life of superstardom in the NBA and probably dreamed of one day knocking James off as the “it kid” of the league.

I wonder if, back then, he envisioned himself ever being subjugated to a role of second-fiddle to LeBron.

Now, two years later, we are wondering who Irving is.

Will he be a player who is ultimately okay with being the Robin to LeBron’s Batman? The journey of self-discovery, for Kyrie Irving, whether he recognizes it not, has already begun.

And the answer to that question, finding it and determining what do about it, with all of his potential and dreams—that is Kyrie’s quandary.

Advertisement




Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NBA

NBA Daily: A New Beginning Or The Beginning Of The End?

The Toronto Raptors made some bold moves this off-season, but will those moves be the beginning of something new or the beginning of the end of Raptors run in the East?

Steve Kyler

Published

on

A New Beginning Or The Beginning Of The End?

The Toronto Raptors were clearly at a crossroads after being swept unceremoniously by the Cleveland Cavaliers in May. It was a microcosm of their situation – good enough to win the East in the regular season, but not good enough to win in big playoff games.

The Raptors went on to fire Dwane Casey as head coach, despite him ultimately being named Coach of The Year. The idea behind the firing wasn’t an emotional reaction to the swept; it was the acceptance of the reality that Casey wasn’t going to evolve as a coach, at least not the way management had hoped.

Casey’s ouster wasn’t the only change; the Raptors also traded away franchise cornerstone DeMar DeRozan in a “dare to be great” trade with San Antonio for forward Kawhi Leonard.

From a pure talent standpoint, Leonard is an upgrade in almost every way to DeRozan, a multi-time All-Star in his own right. The problem with Leonard isn’t what he is as a player, its what he’s become as a person. No one saw the divorce in San Antonio coming, nor the lengths his camp would go to force an exit and leave countless millions on the table for a new start.

The problem for Toronto is the new start Leonard was seeking never included them. So, much like the Oklahoma City Thunder did a year ago with Paul George, the Raptors are hopeful that a long and successful courtship of Leonard could win him over and into a new long-term deal. If that sounds like a pipe dream, it probably is.

Let’s be real about a few things.

Toronto is a beautiful and passionate basketball city, but is that enough to sway a kid from Southern California to stay? The Raptor faithful will point to DeRozan as an example of yes; he did exactly that when he signed his current deal. But is the situation ideal for Leonard, again the answer might be yes, especially if he is fully recovered from the quad injury that sidelined him for most of last season.

There is no doubting that the Raptors are built to win right now. They won 59 games with arguably the same roster and will enter an Eastern Conference that no longer has LeBron James in Cleveland.

Sure, the Boston Celtics and Philadelphia 76ers are formidable challengers for supremacy in the East and let’s not forget about the Indiana Pacers, who could be in that same pack of teams vying for the top spot. But are any of them far and away better than the Raptors in terms of proven in their prime players?

The script seems to be written for the Raptors to either explode and cement themselves at the top of the East or implode on their own decisions.

New Raptors coach Nick Nurse is as a good as they come from the assistant ranks. He is a bright basketball mind, and he knows his players and has relationships with most of them. The question is will he be as good as advertised? If he not, this dance could be over before it starts.

Leonard has so much to prove after orchestrating his exit from San Antonio. If he gets back to MVP form in Toronto how can the Raptors not be considered the front-runner for the East? Yes, Boston is going to be really good too, but if you were betting on two players – MVP version of Kyrie Irving or MVP version of Leonard, who are you taking?

The problem for the Raptors is what if Leonard isn’t that guy again? What if all the negativity becomes too much? What if not being coddled and sheltered by the Spurs is a problem? No, Leonard isn’t a baby that needs mothering, but if you have followed anything about Leonard, he’s not this rock of a person that can handle anything. It’s a real question only he can answer with his play on the floor.

Equally, what if the quad isn’t fully healed or he goes Isaiah Thomas and tries to come back on to make it worse and needs surgery?

These are not easy questions to answer.

If the Raptors come out on top of most of these decisions – Nurse and Leonard are what people hope them to be — then things could swing in a very interesting direction for the Raptor franchise.

That’s what makes the “dare to be great” move interesting.

Thunder GM Sam Presti made news when he was quoted in Paul George’s ESPN docu-series, saying one of his favorite Lyrics was from Tribe Called Quest – “Scared money don’t make none” — in rationalizing his all-in approach to George.

It seems like Raptor president Masai Ujiri may have stolen a play from the Thunder playbook, because the franchise is now all the way in on the make or break moves of this off-season.

This could be the beginning of a new chapter for the Raptors, or it could end being the moves that cratered something special.

More Twitter: Make sure you are following all of our guys on Twitter to ensure you are getting the very latest from our team: @stevekylerNBA, @LangGreene, @EricPincus, @TommyBeer, @jblancartenba, @Ben_Dowsett, @SpinDavies, @JamesB_NBA, @MattJohnNBA, @DrewMaresca, @JordanHicksNBA, and @Ben__Nadeau .

Continue Reading

NBA

NBA Daily: Why Teams Should Think Twice Before Tanking

Making up for the loss of a superstar is not a cut and dry, writes Spencer Davies.

Spencer Davies

Published

on

Making up for the loss of a superstar is not a cut and dry affair.

If it happens, ownership and management have to choose between two options.

1) Attempt to stay competitive
2) Blow everything up and go for a high draft pick

The second choice seems to be the favorite path for executives to take as of late. After all, just look at the job the Philadelphia 76ers have done with perfecting the art of the aptly named process, “tanking.”

Former Sixers general manager Sam Hinkie’s three ultra-quotable words have turned NBA fans on to see the bigger picture. Who cares if a team has to suffer through multiple seasons of losing? If it takes a couple of years, so be it. In the end, we’ll reset with younger talent to build around. Trust The Process.

Philadelphia lost a lot of games between the 2013 and 2017 seasons. It was flat out brutal to watch. With that said, it did give the organization the opportunity to draft the likes of Joel Embiid and Ben Simmons and acquire a young international talent like Dario Saric.

They were extremely patient throughout this whole operation. Brett Brown remained the head coach through thick and thin. Players swore on buying into what was being preached.

Last season was a breakthrough for the Sixers. They won 52 games and made the playoffs for the first time since the 2011-12 campaign. Two of the guys they drafted turned into recognizable names with their play and have sky-high potential to break through in this upcoming season.

But is this really what it takes to achieve relevancy and perpetual competition in the NBA now? Do you really have to wipe the slate clean entirely and put out an unacceptable product year-in and year-out for half a decade so that there’s a possibility of one day becoming a winning franchise?

It’s obvious that Philadelphia did its homework, but who’s to say that other front offices can function like that? The Sacramento Kings have been in the doldrums for 12 years. The Orlando Magic have missed the playoffs for six straight seasons and the New York Knicks haven’t made an appearance in five.

What it comes down to is hitting on draft picks, plain and simple. You don’t hear often about the missteps of the process. Nerlens Noel was supposed to be a key piece of the Sixers core, as was Jahlil Okafor. Both of those players were top six selections in their respective drafts.

In order to acquire Noel (along with New Orleans’ 2014 first-round pick), Philadelphia sent Jrue Holiday, Pierre Jackson and the 42nd overall pick in the 2013 NBA Draft to the newly branded New Orleans Pelicans.

In hindsight, this was an awful move—no bones about it. Holiday had been coming off an All-Star season. He stood a head above the rest on a roster mixed with veterans and middle-of-their-career players. Most impressive of all, it was only his third year in the league.

The Sixers picked a gamble that did not return the results they were hoping for. Michael Carter-Williams won Rookie of the Year and Noel had his moments, but there’s no way it was worth losing a player the caliber of Holiday. But they had to abide by the process by any means necessary, right?

Philadelphia hasn’t won a championship, yet they’re heading in the right direction. They were able to overcome those bumps in the road. The three teams in Sacramento, Orlando and New York to this point have not.

Tanking may not be the wrong answer. It’s not always the right one, though. It all depends on timing. Take a different approach of re-tooling in lieu of rebuilding.

A prime example of this viewpoint is the Utah Jazz last season. After Gordon Hayward signed with the Boston Celtics, many pundits stuck a dead duck label on the Utah Jazz. Those people said that in spite of the fact that the organization was on the rise with a brilliant head coach and an up-and-coming center bordering on best defensive player in the league status.

General manager Dennis Lindsey made a few moves here or there, but did not even think about giving up on the overall progress the Jazz had attained. He kept Quin Snyder and Rudy Gobert, drafted Donovan Mitchell and began a new chapter in the same book instead of writing a different novel.

Utah opened a ton of eyes last season, not only making the playoffs—competing until the very end. And even that was fluky when injuries came into the picture.

They never had to go into the gutter. In the four straight years the Jazz missed the playoffs, it wasn’t because of a set strategy to take a nosedive. They had the wrong coach the first two and were learning how to play winning basketball under the right leader the next two.

It seems as if the Cleveland Cavaliers are taking that route instead of the usual cry to “blow it up.” This isn’t comparing the impact of losing Hayward to LeBron James. That would be irresponsible. But they’ve clearly formed a strategy for all of this and were much more prepared the second time around.

Their true plans were revealed on July 24 when Kevin Love signed a four-year, $120 million extension to stick around with the wine and gold. Confusion surfaced all around. Nearly everybody in the NBA world expected general manager Koby Altman to trade him and stock up on future assets. After all, the Cavaliers’ first-round draft pick next season only conveys if they finish as a bottom 10 team in the league. If they do not, the selection goes to the Atlanta Hawks.

While that’s a true statement, nothing is guaranteed. Anything that happens in a season can be unpredictable. Anything that goes on in a draft is unpredictable.

In one timeline, Cleveland could be as bad of a team as some are predicting with Love. In another, they could make the playoffs and shock their doubters.

We don’t know what Collin Sexton will be in this league yet. We do know that experience is irreplaceable. Why not surround the young man with talent for him to breed confidence in himself and others? It’s better than losing a ton of games because the front office is waiting for the next guy to pair him with, right?

The Cavaliers are keeping their head coach. They’re acquiring players aching for an opportunity. They’re altering their direction, but keeping the same focus.

With LeBron James, Cleveland made four straight NBA Finals. In doing so, they’ve set a standard for the organization. Even with The King going west, why would it make any sense to change that message?

Considering the talent this league already has and the “super teams” that are being built among them, there is a difference between a ball club that wins 20 games and one that wins 35. They both miss out on the postseason and have a lottery pick, however, Team A silently creates losing habits while Team B tries to instill a culture of winning.

There is no perfect method for filling a void left by losing a superstar player. Nobody is a psychic.

Maybe it’s naïve to criticize “The Process” for not wanting to be in NBA purgatory—usually somewhere stuck between a seven seed in the playoffs and the 10th team in the conference standings—but tanking is a tricky game. Precision is necessary to pull it off. If it isn’t there, you’ll be in a world of hurt.

At least when you’re in NBA purgatory, you can add to what you have or try a different coach. Championship or bust is a dangerous mentality in the current landscape of sports.

Of course, that’s always the goal, but very few understand what it takes to get to that point. It all starts with a winning attitude, a quality of most teams that have tanked do not possess.

Continue Reading

NBA

NBA Daily: The Summer’s Most Impactful Coaching Hires

There have been a lot of coaching swaps this offseason, but there are only a select few that should impact what happens next year.

Matt John

Published

on

Building a successful team is like cooking a meal. The players serve as the ingredients, while the coach serves as the cook who stirs the ingredients. A championship team requires the right ingredients just as much as it requires an adept cook.

Take the Warriors for example. Mark Jackson played an important role in putting Golden State back on the map in 2013. However, after it was clear that he wasn’t capable of pushing them much further the following year, they replaced him with Steve Kerr.

That made all the difference. The Dubs went from pseudo-contender to legitimate contender, thanks to their new coach revolutionizing the team’s offense. The team went from the league’s 12th-ranked offense in the league the previous season (107.5 points per 100 possessions) to its second (111.6). Stephen Curry’s evolution into a basketball supernova led the way of course, but it was Kerr’s revisions to the team that pushed them to another level.

It all started with how he handled his rotation. Making Draymond Green a full-time starter while also transitioning Andre Iguodala into the sixth man made the Dubs all the more lethal as a team. The final touch was forming the “Death Lineup”, which consisted of Curry, Green, Iguodala, Klay Thompson, and Harrison Barnes, that made Golden State nearly impossible to stop.

Golden State had a roster built for a title. All they needed was a coach who could get them the best results. Kerr was the man for the job.

That goes to show how vital a coach is to a franchise that has high aspirations.

Because of success stories like Golden State, we saw quite a few coaching changes this summer from teams hoping to have a Hollywood ending much like the Warriors.

Milwaukee Bucks – Mike Budenholzer

Poor Coach Bud. It’s not his fault that the Hawks team that he guided to 60 wins in 2015 slowly disintegrated over the last three years. Luckily he got out of there to avoid having to take on a rebuild. So now, he gets a fresh start in Wisconsin.

Budenholzer’s stock has gone down considerably since winning the Coach of the Year three years ago. That being said, he’s shown that when he has lemons, he can make lemonade. Now that he is running the show in Milwaukee, he is coaching one of the more unique situations in the league. Coach Bud now has a superstar at his arsenal in Giannis Antetokounmpo, which is something he never had in Atlanta.

It’s true that Milwaukee has been one of the league’s frequent underachievers since they kicked the tires of the Greek Freek era, but their talent cannot be understated. Remember that Coach Bud once made the likes of Jeff Teague and Kyle Korver All-Stars, statuses that they’ve never come close to regaining since. If he can do that with guys like Teague and Korver, imagine what he can do with Giannis and Co.

Milwaukee has also done a solid job building a team that fits Budenholzer’s emphasis on floor stretching. Adding Brook Lopez and bringing back Ersan Ilyasova should give a team that ranked 21st in three-point percentage more spacing. That’s quite impressive since Milwaukee had the ninth-best offensive rating in the league (109.8).

Milwaukee’s been trying to find their big break for a while now. They may have found theirs in Coach Bud.

Detroit Pistons – Dwane Casey

Nobody had a harder spring than Casey. Usually, winning Coach of the Year would be a moment worth treasuring, but in Casey’s case, it was far from it. Leading up to getting the award, Casey and the Raptors were swept by the Cavs for the second consecutive time, then he got fired shortly afterward. Casey getting Coach of the Year this season was pretty much like Dirk Nowitzki getting the MVP in 2007 after getting upset by the Warriors in the first round.

Thankfully, Casey’s illustrious resume was good enough for him to land on his feet just about anywhere. That anywhere happens to be Motown, where he’s replacing Stan Van Gundy as head coach. Detroit also has not had the most success since they’ve turned to Andre Drummond. That could be attributed to the unfortunate injuries that they’ve had to deal with in the last two years.

Despite having the persistent monkey on his back come playoff time, Casey has improved his craft in response to his failures. The Raptors saw improvement every year when Casey ran the show, and now Casey has the chance to show he can do the same in Detroit.

It will be an interesting transition going from the Raptors to the Pistons. Though not as talented as Toronto’s, Detroit’s strength should primarily come from their frontcourt. Blake Griffin and Andre Drummond should be one of the league’s best frontcourt pairings on paper. Casey has a reputation for making things work, so now that they will have a full season together, they may shine more than they did last season.

One particular question that should be answered is if Toronto’s problem was Casey or his roster. That may be answered by how Detroit does this season. Oh hey, speaking of Toronto…

Toronto Raptors – Nick Nurse

There seems to be a fair amount of optimism surrounding Nurse. Supposedly, he was the reason why the Raptors’ offense improved so much last season. Casey executed it to perfection, but Nurse was the one who designed it. Now, he’s at the forefront on a team that is desperate for success now more than ever.

This is Nurse’s first gig as a head coach, and the pressure is going to be on. It’s not just that Toronto’s been trying to get past its playoff demons. Now that they have Kawhi Leonard, they have to do everything in their power to keep him around — tall order given he seems hellbent on going to L.A.

Still, Leonard is an upgrade over DeMar DeRozan. Acquiring him, along with promoting Nurse, shows that the Raptors aren’t playing around. Being the head coach for one of the league’s powerhouses is a big break for Nurse. This may be his only to chance to prove he deserves a spot in this league.

James Borrego – Charlotte Hornets

Another Popovich protegee moving up through the ranks! Borrego has had some head coaching experience, though it was with the Orlando Magic, who were not going anywhere, three years ago. Now he’s going to Charlotte, a team that’s in a pretty tough situation right now.

Right now, Charlotte is hard-capped on a roster that does not have much room for improvement. The team has not made the playoffs in two years, and it’s hard to imagine how they improve from where they currently are. However, that might be why they hired Borrego.

Instead of going for a known name like Stan Van Gundy or Jeff Hornacek, they went with a guy who has learned under the NBA’s best coach for several years. Coach Bud became a great coach after learning from Pop, so perhaps Borrego may follow in his footsteps. This is a pivotal year for Charlotte since Kemba Walker’s bargain contract is expiring. If Borrego can help Charlotte return to the playoffs, then that could do wonders for them.

Note that David Fizdale, Lloyd Pierce, and Igor Kokoskov weren’t named. It isn’t fair to include them because the teams they are running are currently in the rebuilding phase with little expectation. They could be very impactful hires down the line. Just don’t expect a lot from them right away.

Same goes for J.B. Bickerstaff, but that’s because he already was the Grizzlies’ head coach. Now he’s full-time instead of interim. Call it cheating if you want to.

As for those who have been named, these hires should have a significant impact on what happens in the Eastern Conference playoff race this season. One of these hires could very well put their team in the finals, while another could put them in the NBA lottery.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

NBA Team Salaries

Advertisement

Trending Now