Connect with us

NBA

2015-16 Los Angeles Clippers Season Preview

Basketball Insiders previews the Los Angeles Clippers’ 2015-16 season.

Basketball Insiders

Published

on

The Los Angeles Clippers seemed to be on a path to something special last postseason, advancing past the San Antonio Spurs in the first round and taking a 3-1 advantage over the Houston Rockets in the second round. However, the team stalled and dropped three-straight games to be ousted once again in the second round of the playoffs. With a 56-26 record, the Clippers have a lot to live up to, but after a productive offseason, they may now be better positioned for a deeper postseason run.

Basketball Insiders previews the Los Angeles Clippers’ 2015-16 season.

Five Thoughts

In my recent Q&A with Blake Griffin, I described the Clippers this way: They have two Most Valuable Player candidates (Griffin and Chris Paul), a former Coach of the Year (Doc Rivers), a Finals MVP (Paul Pierce), a Defensive Player of the Year candidate (DeAndre Jordan), a two-time Sixth Man of the Year (Jamal Crawford) and a combined 23 All-Star appearances. There’s no question this team is talented. Don’t sleep on the Clippers in the Western Conference this season, as this could be the year they put it all together and play to their full potential.

2nd Place — Pacific Division

-Alex Kennedy

Few teams had as good an offseason as the Clippers, who not only wrestled DeAndre Jordan away from the white-knuckled clutches of Mark Cuban, but also added Josh Smith and Paul Pierce on friendly deals and nabbed Lance Stephenson away from Charlotte for very little. A lot has been made about what role Jamal Crawford will have on this team moving forward, but all that means is the team’s biggest problem is having too much talent. Philadelphia would trade all their first round picks for the next 15 years to have that problem. Chris Paul, Blake Griffin and Jordan constitute an elite big three, but Pierce, Stephenson, Smith, Crawford and J.J. Redick put them in the conversation for title favorites. Golden State is a fast rabbit to catch, but the Clippers look like they’re closer than anybody to getting there. If only their new uniforms weren’t so painful to look at it would be a lot easier to get unabashedly excited about the upcoming season.

2nd Place — Pacific Division

-Joel Brigham

The Clippers were winners in offseason free agency. They kept DeAndre Jordan from the lures of the Dallas Mavericks; signed Josh Smith, who is coming off a turnaround season with the Houston Rockets; brought playoff sharpshooter Paul Pierce back home; and added backcourt depth with Pablo Prigioni. The Clippers also traded for Lance Stephenson, who is looking to bounce back from a forgettable season with the Charlotte Hornets. Then again, winning in the regular season hasn’t been the Clippers problem. They should, once again, be one of the top teams in the West. But if they don’t become a legitimate title contender this season, at some point it is time to change up their core.

2nd Place — Pacific Division

-Jessica Camerato

In short, the Clippers have everything they need to win a championship. Their depth is vastly improved thanks to the additions of Paul Pierce, Josh Smith, Lance Stephenson and Pablo Prigioni and the experience of last year’s meltdown against the Rockets could, in theory, make them stronger. I believe the Clippers could have won everything last year, so this year, I am leaning toward choosing them as my preseason favorite to win everything. I did that last year and ended up looking silly, but what can I say? I believe in Chris Paul and I believe in Doc Rivers. I’ll take the Warriors to repeat as division champions but if they see the Clippers in the playoffs, I might take Paul and Pierce to score the upset.

2nd Place — Pacific Division

-Moke Hamilton

What an up and down summer for the Los Angeles Clippers. The team almost lost center DeAndre Jordan in free agency but managed to convince the big man to stay home. Jordan’s change of heart could be the difference between title contention and what appeared to be a trip to the middle of the pack out West. The team added Lance Stephenson, Paul Pierce, Josh Smith and Wesley Johnson to solidify depth on the wings and interior. There’s no doubt the Clippers are geared up for a title run – on paper at least.

2nd Place — Pacific Division

-Lang Greene

Top of the List

Top Offensive Player: Chris Paul

Blake Griffin could easily be listed as the team’s top weapon, and the Clippers need him to be neck and neck with Paul, but the veteran point guard drives the team’s offense both as scorer and playmaker. Paul is a true point guard, who almost always looks for his teammates first — but he’s also a crafty individual scorer. The Paul/Griffin duo is a special combination.

Top Defensive Player: DeAndre Jordan

Jordan was the top rebounder in the NBA last season, and is a shot-blocking presence. The Clippers rely on their center to protect the rim, and have struggled to get stops in recent years when he’s on the bench. Almost losing Jordan to the Dallas Mavericks would have been a significant setback defensively for the Clippers.

Top Playmaker: Chris Paul

“Top Playmaker in the NBA” would work here as well.  Paul is a ball-dominant point guard, but he’s not holding onto the rock without purpose or stagnating the offense to get his shot – rather he’s orchestrating one of the NBA’s better offensive units with the Clippers. Low turnovers, on-the-money lobs, pick and roll, Paul is the best at what he does.

Top Clutch Player: Paul Pierce

Both Paul and Griffin have had their moments as clutch players — and their failures, especially in the postseason. The Clippers have added aformer Boston Celtics champion in Pierce, and while he’ll turn 38 years old before the season starts, the Inglewood star is still a go-to end-of-game scorer. Last playoffs, Pierce was a big part of the Washington Wizards’ success — although his last-second shot to tie against the Atlanta Hawks was a hair late. In the moments where the Clippers have crumbled in the recent past, Pierce now gives the team a different option to turn to.

The Unheralded Player: Wesley Johnson

Johnson came into the league as a heralded player with the Minnesota Timberwolves as the fourth overall pick in the 2010 NBA Draft. He didn’t live up to the hype, and after two aimless seasons with the struggling Los Angeles Lakers, Johnson has yet to earn his keep in the NBA.  All that said, he’s very athletic and has good instincts as a perimeter defender. Johnson can’t be relied on for consistent offense, but can hit an open three-pointer. Finally surrounded by a quality team, Johnson may show he has something of true value to offer the Clippers. A wild card could be Lance Stephenson, if he can return to form after a down year with the Charlotte Hornets.

Best New Addition: Josh Smith

In addition to Pierce,  Smith was a great get by the Clippers for a one-year minimum salary. The versatile veteran can defend multiple positions and may play a bit of everything in the front court; from small forward all the way to small-ball center. Smith isn’t a great shooter but he can hit in bunches, and is an above-average playmaker for a forward.

-Eric Pincus

Who We Like

Chris Paul: Because Chris Paul.

Blake Griffin: At times over the past couple of years, Griffin has shown signs of being an unstoppable force near the basket. He’s improved his shooting range, but needs to find that consistency where he flat out can’t be denied every night. He recently discussed that (and many other things) with our own Alex Kennedy.

The starting five: J.J. Redick and DeAndre Jordan complement Paul and Griffin well. Coach Doc Rivers hasn’t committed to a small forward yet. Whether they go with the veteran scorer Pierce or the athletic Johnson, the Clippers will have a formidable starting five.

The improved reserves: The Clippers’ biggest weakness last season was bench depth. Now with Jamal Crawford, Josh Smith, Austin Rivers, Pablo Prigioni, Cole Aldrich, Lance Stephenson and either Johnson or Pierce, the team has a strong reserve core.

-Eric Pincus

Strengths

In each of the last two years, the Clippers have had the No. 1 offense in the NBA. They clearly score the ball with ease, averaging 109.8 points per 100 possessions last year. This L.A. squad has talent, depth, continuity and hunger. Some of the bench pieces have changed, and Matt Barnes is gone, but the core of the team has put in time together. They’ve fallen short year after year, but have the most talented roster in the Griffin/Paul era.  The Clippers should have a formidable run in them this season.

-Eric Pincus

Weaknesses

Maybe the Clippers don’t ever get over that playoff hump, and remain an almost-great franchise that never quite got it done. The depth behind DeAndre Jordan at the center position is a bit of a concern, although small-ball could work well as a backup plan. Jordan’s free-throw shooting is always an issue as well. The Clippers aren’t perfect behind Paul at the point with an aging Pablo Prigioni and a still developing Austin Rivers.

-Eric Pincus

The Burning Question

Are the Clippers’ short-comings an inherent defect or will they finally break through in the playoffs?

Two years ago, Chris Paul made key errors that cost the Clippers a playoff game against the Oklahoma City Thunder and ultimately the series. The Clippers had the Rockets on the ropes at Staples Center in an elimination game and just fell apart. In both years, the Clippers’ only failure wasn’t in the “choke” games, but in the subsequent games where they didn’t show the fortitude to overcome and prevail. Was it bad luck, lack of depth or situational issues – or will the Griffin/Paul/Jordan core always find a way to flame out in the first or second round?

-Eric Pincus

Advertisement




1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Pingback: The Credits: "The Adjuster" - Lakers Links - The Sports Center

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NBA

Reviewing the Nurkic Trade: Denver’s Perspective

The Denver Nuggets have been on a miraculous run this postseason, but that doesn’t mean that they’re infallible. Drew Maresca reviews the 2017 trade that sent Jusuf Nurkic from Denver to Portland.

Drew Maresca

Published

on

The Denver Nuggets are fresh off of a 114-106 win over the Los Angeles Lakers in the Western Conference Finals, pulling within three wins of the franchise’s first trip to the NBA Finals. But what if I told you that the Nuggets’ roster could be even more talented by acting more deliberately in a trade from three years ago?

While Denver won on Tuesday night, they lost a nail bitter on Sunday – for which most of the blame has been pointed at a defensive breakdown by Nuggets’ center Mason Plumlee, who was procured in the aforementioned 2017 trade. What did it cost Denver, you ask? Just Jusuf Nurkic and a first-round pick.

Nurkic was a 2014-15 All-Rookie second team member. He played 139 games over 2.5 seasons in Denver, averaging 7.5 points and 5.9 rebounds in approximately 18 minutes per game. He showed serious promise, but Denver had numerous reasons to pursue a trade: he’d suffered a few relatively serious injuries early in his career (and he’s continued to be injury-prone in Portland), butted heads with head coach Michael Malone and – most importantly – the Nuggets stumbled on to Nikola Jokic.

The Nuggets eventually attempted a twin-tower strategy with both in the starting line-up, but that experiment was short-lived — with Jokic ultimately asking to move to the team’s second unit.

The Nuggets traded Nurkic to the Portland Trail Blazers in February 2017 (along with a first-round pick) in exchange for Plumlee, a second-round pick and cash considerations. Ironically, the first-round pick included in the deal became Justin Jackson, who was used to procure another center, Zach Collins – but more on that in a bit.

As of February 2017, Plumlee was considered the better player of the two. He was averaging a career-high 11 points, 8.1 rebounds and 4.0 assists through 54 games – but it was clear that at 27, he’d already maximized his talent.

Conversely, Nurkic was only 23 at the time of the trade with significant, untapped upside. In his first few seasons with Portland, Nurkic averaged 15 points and 9.8 rebounds per game, while establishing himself as a rising star. As noted above, injuries have continued to be a problem. Nurkic suffered a compound fracture in his tibia and fibula in March 2019, forcing him to miss a majority of this current campaign. The COVID-19-related play stoppage in March gave Nurkic extra time to get his body right, and he returned to action in July inside the bubble.

And he did so with a vengeance. Nurkic demonstrated superior strength and footwork, and he flashed the dominance that Portland hoped he would develop, posting eight double-doubles in 18 contests. He averaged 17.6 points and 10.3 rebounds per game and while his play dipped a bit in the playoffs – partially due to a matchup with first-team All-NBA star Anthony Davis – he still managed 14.2 points and 10.4 rebounds in the five-game series. So it’s fair to say that Nurkic is still on his way toward stardom.

But the Nuggets are in the conference finals – so all’s well that ends well, right? Not so fast. To his credit, Plumlee is exactly who Denver expected him to be. He’s averaged 7.5 points and 5.5 rebounds per game in three seasons with Denver since 2017 – but to be fair, Plumlee is asked to do less in Denver than he had in Portland. Still, it’s fairly obvious that they’re just not that comparable.

Plumlee is a good passer and an above-average defender that’ll compete hard and isn’t afraid to get dirty – but he has limitations. He doesn’t stretch the floor and he is a sub-par free throw shooter (53.5 percent in 2019-20). More importantly, he’s simply not a major offensive threat and his repertoire of moves is limited.

High-level takeaway: Defenses tend to game plan for opponents they view as major threats – Nurkic falls into this category. Other guys pack the stat sheet through putback attempts, open looks and single coverage alongside the guys for whom opposing defenses game plan – that’s a more appropriate description of Plumlee.

On to the wrench thrown in by Zach Collins’ involvement. Statistically, Collins is about as effective as Plumlee – he averaged 7 points and 6.3 rebounds through only 11 games in 2019-20 due to various injuries – and he possesses more upside. The 22-year-old is not as reliable as Plumlee but given his age and skill set, he’s a far better option as a support player playing off the bench. He stretches the floor (36.8 percent on three-point attempts in 2019-20), is an above-average free throw shooter (75 percent this season) and is a good defender. Looking past Nurkic for a moment, would the Nuggets prefer a 22-year-old center that stretches the floor and defends or a 30-year-old energy guy?

Regardless of your answer to that question, it’s hard to argue that Nurkic should have returned more than Plumlee, definitely so when you factor in the first-round pick Denver included. There is obviously more at play: Denver was probably considering trading Nurkic for some time before they acted – did they feel that they could increase his trade value prior to the trade deadline in 2016-17? Maybe. Further, Nurkic and his agent could have influenced the Nuggets’ decision at the 2017 deadline, threatening to stonewall Denver in negotiations.

Had Nurkic been more patient or the Nuggets acted sooner before it became abundantly clear that he was on the move, Denver’s roster could be even more stacked than it is now. Ultimately, the Nuggets have a plethora of talent and will be fine – while it appears that Nurkic found a long-term home in Portland, where he owns the paint offensively. Denver can’t be thrilled about assisting a division rival, but they’re still in an enviable position today and should be for years to come.

But despite that, this deal should go down as a cautionary tale – it’s not only the bottom feeders of the league who make missteps. Even the savviest of front offices overthink deals. Sometimes that works in their favor, and other times it does not.

Continue Reading

NBA

NBA Daily: They Guessed Wrong

Matt John reflects on some of the key decisions that were made last summer, and how their disappointing results hurt both team outlooks and players’ legacies.

Matt John

Published

on

It doesn’t sound possible, but did you know that the crazy NBA summer of 2019 was, in fact, over a year ago? Wildly, in any normal, non-pandemic season, it all would have been over three months ago and, usually, media days would be right around the corner, but not this time. The 2019-20 NBA season is slated to end sometime in early to mid-October, so the fact that the last NBA off-season was over a year ago hasn’t really dawned on anyone yet. Craziest of all, even though there will still be an offseason, there technically won’t be any summer.

Coronavirus has really messed up the NBA’s order. Of course, there are much worse horrors that COVID-19 has inflicted upon the world – but because of what it’s done to the NBA, let’s focus on that and go back to the summer of 2019. It felt like an eternity, but the Golden State Warriors’ three-year reign had finally reached its end. The Toronto Raptors’ victory over the tyranny that was the Hamptons Five – as battered as they were – made it feel like order had been restored to the NBA. There was more to it than that though.

Klay Thompson’s and Kevin Durant’s season-ending injuries, along with the latter skipping town to join Kyrie Irving in Brooklyn meant two things.

1. Golden State was down for the count
2. Brooklyn’s time wasn’t coming until next year.

A one-year window was open. Even if neither Golden State nor Brooklyn posed the same threat that the former did when it had Kevin Durant, those were two contenders out of commission. If there was a time to go all in, it was in 2019.

Milwaukee certainly seemed to go all in. For the most part.  Malcolm Brogdon’s departure seemed a little odd since he was arguably their best non-Giannis playmaker when they were in crunch time. Not to mention there was nothing really stopping the Bucks from keeping him except for money. Detractors will call out Milwaukee for electing to cheap out by not keeping Brogdon and hence, avoiding the luxury tax. However, there’s more to it than that.

Milwaukee thought it had enough with the core it had on its roster. Coming off the best season they had put up since the eighties, they believed the franchise built the right team to contend. There was an argument that keeping Brogdon may have been overkill with their guard depth – let’s not forget that Donte DiVincenzo did a solid job in Brogdon’s role as the backup facilitator. This would have been more defensible had it not been for Milwaukee picking the wrong guy to let go. That was the indefensible part- electing to keep Eric Bledsoe over Brogdon.

Bledsoe wasn’t necessarily a bad investment. No one’s complaining about an almost 15 point average on 47/34/79 splits or playing individual defense tight enough to get named on the All-Defensive second team. By all accounts, Bledsoe earns his keep. That is until the playoffs. Bledsoe’s postseason woes have been a weight ever since he first entered Milwaukee, and this postseason was more of the same.

Bledsoe’s numbers dwindled to just 11.7 points on 39/25/81 splits, and Milwaukee getting ousted in five games at the hands of Miami made his struggles stand out even more than it had ever been. Bledsoe may be the better athlete and the better defender, but Brogdon’s all-around offensive savvy and his only slight dropoff defensively from Brogdon would have made him a bit more reliable.

Milwaukee guessed wrong when they opted to extend Bledsoe before the postseason last year when they could have waited until that very time to evaluate who to keep around. Now they face a hell of a lot more questions than they did at the end of last season – questions that may have been avoided had they made the right choice.

Now they could have kept both of them, yes, but it’s not totally unreasonable to think that maybe their approach with the luxury tax would have worked and maybe they would still be in the postseason right now had they gone with the homegrown talent. And just maybe, there wouldn’t be nearly as much of this Greek Freak uncertainty.

The Houston Rockets can relate. They got bruised up by a team that everyone thought Houston had the edge on going into the series and then crushed by the Lakers. Now, Mike D’Antoni is gone. The full-time small ball experiment likely did not work out. Since the Rockets emptied most of their assets to bring in Russell Westbrook and Robert Covington, there may not be a route in which they can become better than they presently are.

The mistake wasn’t trading for Russell Westbrook. The mistake was trading Chris Paul.

To be fair, most everybody severely overestimated Chris Paul’s decline. He’s not among the best of the best anymore, but he’s still pretty darn close. He deserved his All-NBA second team selection as well as finishing No. 7 overall in MVP voting. OKC had no business being as good as they were this season, and Paul was the driving force as to why.

For all we know, the previously-assumed tension between Chris Paul and James Harden would have made its way onto the court no matter what. Even so, Houston’s biggest obstacle in the Bay Area had crumbled. If they had just stayed the course, maybe they’re still in the postseason too.

To their credit, none of this may have happened had it not been for the Kawhi Leonard decision. Had he chosen differently, the Thunder never blow it up, and Houston might have very well been the favorite in the Western Conference. Instead, the Rockets took a step back from being in the title discussion to dark horse. But at least they can take pride knowing that they weren’t expected to win it all – the Clippers can’t.

Seeing the Clippers fall well short expectations begs the question if they too got it wrong. The answer is, naturally: of course not. They may have paid a hefty price for Paul George, but the only way they were getting Kawhi Leonard – one of the best players of his generation – was if PG-13 came in the package. As lofty as it was, anyone would have done the same thing if they were in their shoes. They didn’t get it wrong. Kawhi did.

On paper, the Clippers had the most talented roster in the entire league. It seemed like they had every hole filled imaginable. Surrounding Leonard and George was three-point shooting, versatility, a productive second unit, an experienced coach – you name it. There was nothing stopping them from breaking the franchise’s long-lasting curse. Except themselves.

Something felt off about them. They alienated opponents. They alienated each other. At times, they played rather lackadaisically, like the title had already been signed, sealed, and delivered to them. The media all assumed they’d cut the malarkey and get their act together – but that moment never really came. They had their chances to put Denver away, but even if they had, after seeing their struggles to beat them – and to be fair Dallas too – would their day of destiny with the Lakers have really lived up to the hype?

Even if it was never in the cards, one can’t help but wonder what could have happened had Kawhi chosen to stay with the team he won his second title with.

Toronto was the most impressive team in this league this season. They still managed to stay at the top of the east in spite of losing an all-timer like Leonard. That team had every component of a winner except a superstar. They had the right culture for a championship team. Just not the right talent. The Clippers were the exact opposite. They had the right talent for a championship team but not the right culture. That’s why the Raptors walked away from the postseason feeling proud of themselves for playing to their full potential while the Clippers writhed in disappointment and angst over their future.

In the end, everyone mentioned here may ultimately blame what happened to their season on the extenuating circumstances from the pandemic. The Bucks’ chemistry never fully returned when the Bubble started. Contracting COVID and dealing with quad problems prevented Westbrook from reviving the MVP-type player he was before the hiatus. As troubling as the Clippers had played, the extra time they would have had to work things out in a normal season was taken away from them.

For all we know, next year will be a completely different story. The Rockets, Bucks, and Kawhi may ultimately have their faith rewarded for what they did in the summer of 2019 – but that will only be mere speculation until the trio can change the story.

Continue Reading

NBA

Looking Toward The Draft: Power Forwards

Basketball Insiders continues their NBA Draft watch, this time with the power forwards.

David Yapkowitz

Published

on

We got some updated NBA draft news this week when the league announced that several key dates have been pushed back including the draft, the start of free agency and the beginning of the 2020-21 season.

The 2020 draft was originally scheduled for Oct. 16, but it will now likely occur sometime in November. Obviously, with the COVID-19 pandemic still wildly out of control in the United States, all of these potential deadlines are fluid and subject to change.

With that said, we’re continuing our position by position breakdown here at Basketball Insiders of some of the top 2020 draft prospects. We looked at the point guards and shooting guards last week, and this week we’re covering the small forwards and power forwards.

The power forward crop, like the draft overall, doesn’t appear to be as strong as recent years, that doesn’t mean there aren’t potential contributors and high-level NBA players available, as well as one who might just turn out to be a star-caliber player.

Onyeka Okongwu, USC – 19 years old

Okongwu is the player who just might develop into a star on some level. He was actually underrated in high school and was snubbed for a McDonald’s All-American selection his senior year. He established himself early on at USC as the team’s best player as a freshman and now appears to have turned some heads.

He’s been mentioned as a lottery pick and in some mock drafts, he’s top 4-5. He possesses a great all-around skill-set; he can score in the post, he can put the ball on the floor and attack and he can shoot. But perhaps his biggest attribute is his versatility on the defensive end. He’s got quick feet and mobility and can guard multiple positions.

Okongwu might actually play center in the NBA, especially in small-ball lineups, but he’s mostly played power forward and so he’ll probably see time there in the league. His skill-set fits perfectly with today’s game.

Obi Toppin, Dayton – 22 years old

Toppin is one of the older players in the draft, and in recent history, players that age tend to slip on draft boards. In Toppin’s case, it looks like the reverse might actually be true. He’s been projected as a lottery pick, and even going in the top 3.

He’s an incredibly athletic player who thrives in the open court. He looks like he’ll do well in an up-tempo offensive system that has capable playmakers who can find him in transition. He’s extremely active around the rim and he can finish strong. A decent shooter too, something he’ll need at the next level.

Toppin has the physical tools to be an effective defensive player, but that’s where the questions marks on him have been. In the NBA, he’s likely going to have to play and guard multiple positions. Whether or not he can adapt to that likely will answer the question as to what his ceiling can be.

Precious Achiuwa, Memphis – 20 years old

Achiuwa is another intriguing prospect. this writer actually got to watch him play in person while he was in high school and he was very impressive. He looked like a man among boys. He’s projected to be a late lottery pick.

He has an NBA-ready body and he’s got some toughness around the rim and in the paint. He was a double-double threat during his one season at Memphis and his knack for rebounding is something that should translate to the NBA. He’s a very good defender too, in particular, as a rim protector. He’s very quick and has the ability to guard multiple positions.

One of the main knocks on Achiuwa is his shooting ability. He didn’t shoot that well in college and power forwards being able to space the floor is almost a requirement in today’s NBA game. It’s something he can certainly work on and improve on though.

Honorable Mentions:
Paul Reed, DePaul – 21 years old
Xavier Tillman, Michigan State – 21 years old
Killian Tillie, Gonzaga – 22 years old

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Online Betting Site Betway
Advertisement
American Casino Guide
NJ Casino
NJ Casino

NBA Team Salaries

Advertisement

CloseUp360

Insiders On Twitter

NBA On Twitter

Trending Now