The Gray Areas
Over the last week, there has been a lot of talk about the Indiana Pacers allegations of tampering by the LA Lakers as it pertains to Paul George. The NBA has retained a third-party law firm to investigate the claims; the Lakers have both denied any tampering with George and are cooperating fully with the investigation.
The Pacers filed their complaint just around the draft, so this has been playing out for several weeks and was just recently made public by the venerable Peter Vecsey, who outed the report on his new Patreon account.
While it’s unlikely an investigation reveals any paper trail to tampering, the NBA in the past has sought e-mail and phone records to establish connections that could be deemed tampering. Given the inexperience of the Lakers new front office as operators of a team, it’s possible someone slipped up somewhere with a text message or e-mail. Given the vast experience Laker GM Rob Pelinka has on the agent side of the fence and the equally extensive experience George’s agent Aaron Mintz has, it’s doubtful either were silly enough to actually document some future plan.
That said, if you believe for a second that NBA teams are not looking for some inside angle to land a player they covet, you are sadly mistaken, which is why the outcome of this complaint is so important for the NBA.
By rule, a team is not permitted to have contact with a player under contract to another team until midnight on July 1. However, given the number of NBA staffers that co-mingle with agents, especially around the draft, it’s very common for teams to ask and for agents to answer in casual conversation. It’s also very common for frameworks or deals to be talked about and thought about well in advance of July 1st. In fact, it’s not uncommon for agents to establish meeting schedules for prime free agents for July 1st — the only way that can happen is for teams to talk to that agent before July 1st, which is technically a violation.
One of the big knocks on former Lakers executive Mitch Kupchak is that he wouldn’t play the gray areas of the rules, which often left the Lakers a day or two behind teams that worked the fringes of the rules to get that first meeting or that first offer in front of a free agent player.
Equally, players often make up their minds on where they want to be in advance of July 1, so it’s something of a formality to let the clock tick to midnight before accepting an offer; an offer that was likely constructed as a framework of a deal weeks before. That too is technically not permitted, but happens every summer.
The problem for the NBA isn’t that some things are happening just before July 1; it’s how far ahead some teams are trying to get not only in their recruiting, but also planning their cap for the future.
The Lakers, for example, need to make some roster moves to open up cap space if they are going to try and lure in George and a second max-level free agent (LeBron James?). For that to make sense, they would need some level of assurance they can obtain both before giving away roster talents like Jordan Clarkson and possibly Julius Randle. They will also need to move off of the contract of Luol Deng, which likely will require some inducement by the Lakers to get a team to take on that kind of contract money.
That is a big risky bet for the Lakers to make without some understanding from at least one part of the equation, which is likely why the Pacers believe they may have caught the Lakers getting ahead of the game. Even if the Lakers didn’t slip up, it seems likely that the Pacers ownership wanted to make the Lakers sweat a little too.
As much attention as this story has gotten, the idea of teams reaching out to test interest early is not a new thing. In fact, some teams use their own roster players as intermediaries to gauge interest. The most dangerous time for a team with a high profile pending free agent is the All-Star weekend, a time many in the league are comparing to college recruiting in how aggressively players are contacted about their plans for July.
The NBA ruled some time ago that they are not going to police relationships between players, despite there being very clear tampering language in the Collective Bargaining Agreement that kicked in on July 1. As a result, current roster players are allowed and encouraged to be the point guy. It’s pretty hard to pin tampering on a team, even if it seems more plausible than not, simply because there may never be any documented proof of that.
While the Pacers’ allegations of tampering may result in nothing substantive against the Lakers (if they were smart), it is still a reminder for NBA teams trying to gain a little extra edge that they have to be careful. The penalties the league can levy are real, including loss of draft picks, fines in excess of $5 million or, more importantly, the ability to block the offending team from signing the offended player. That may, in fact, be the end goal for the Pacers given how jilted they felt about how George handled all of this with them.
While it still unlikely the Lakers were silly enough to document something with Geroge or his agent, it is a look into how things get done in the NBA and a cautionary warning that there are consequences if you play too close to the gray areas of the rules.
More Twitter: Make sure you are following all of our guys on Twitter to ensure you are getting the very latest from our team: @stevekylerNBA, @MikeAScotto, @LangGreene, @EricPincus, @joelbrigham, @TommyBeer, @MokeHamilton , @jblancartenba, @Ben_Dowsett, @CodyTaylorNBA, @SpinDavies, @BuddyGrizzard, @JamesB_NBA, @DennisChambers_, and @Ben__Nadeau .
The Case for Upperclassmen in the NBA Draft
College upperclassmen are becoming increasingly viable options in the NBA Draft, writes David Yapkowitz.
Each year when the NBA draft comes around, there seems to be an aversion to taking upperclassman with a top selection. More specifically, it’s college seniors who often find themselves getting drafted in the second-round if at all.
It can be understandable. NBA teams are clearly looking for a home run pick with a lottery selection. They’re looking for a player who they can build a foundation around for years to come. College seniors often project as solid role players to strengthen a team once that foundational superstar is already in place.
However, recent years have seen the entire first round dominated almost entirely by freshmen and sophomores. In 2017, a college senior wasn’t drafted until the San Antonio Spurs took Derrick White with the 29th pick. The Los Angeles Lakers followed that up with Josh Hart. Hart ended up having a better rookie season than a few of the underclassmen taken ahead of him.
A few other upperclassmen, Frank Mason III, a senior, and Dillon Brooks, a junior, both had better rookie seasons than many of the freshmen taking before them as well. Junior Semi Ojeleye is playing a major role for the Boston Celtics who are in the Eastern Conference Finals.
In 2016, Malcolm Brogdon, another college senior, was taken in the second-round with the 36th pick by the Milwaukee Bucks. He went on to win the Rookie of the Year award and was a starter for a playoff team.
Senior Tyrone Wallace was taken with the last pick in the draft at No. 60 that year. When a rash of injuries hit the Los Angeles Clippers this season, Wallace stepped in right away as a starter at times and helped keep the team afloat in the playoff picture.
There were a few college seniors that went undrafted in 2016, players such as Fred VanVleet Yogi Ferrell that have had better NBA careers to this point that a lot of the underclassmen taken ahead of them.
This isn’t to say that NBA teams should completely abandon taking young, underdeveloped players in the first-round. The Spurs took Dejounte Murray, a freshman point guard, over Brogdon, Wallace, VanVleet and Ferrell. That’s worked out well for them. It’s more a testament to having a good front office and scouting team than anything else.
But maybe NBA teams should start expanding their horizons when it comes to the draft. There appears to be a stigma of sorts when it comes to upperclassmen, particularly college seniors. If a guy can play, he can play. Of course, college production is often not the best means of judging NBA success, but it does count for something.
With the 2018 NBA draft about one month away, there are a few interesting names to look at when it comes to college seniors. Players such as Devonte’ Graham from Kansas, Theo Pinson from North Carolina, Chandler Hutchinson from Boise State, Jevon Carter from West Virginia and Bonzie Colson from Notre Dame are all guys that should be on NBA team’s radars.
Sure, none of those guys are going to turn into a superstar or even an All-Star. But you’re probably going to get a player that becomes a solid contributor for years to come.
Again, it’s understandable when teams take projects in the lottery. After a long season of losing, and in some cases years of losing, ownership and the fanbase are hungry for results. They don’t want a top pick to be used on a player that projects as only a solid contributor.
But after the lottery, the rest of the draft gets a little murky. A good front office will find an NBA caliber player whether he’s a freshman or a senior. The NBA Draft isn’t an exact science. Nothing is ever for sure and no player is guaranteed to become the player they’re projected to be.
College upperclassmen tend to be more physically developed and mentally mature for the NBA game. If what you’re looking for is someone who will step right in and produce for a winning team, then instead of wasting a pick on the unknown, it might be better to go with the sure thing.
NBA Daily: Are the Houston Rockets in Trouble?
Game 2 of the Western Conference Finals may have been the perfect storm for Houston, writes Shane Rhodes.
The Houston Rockets took a gut punch from the Golden State Warriors, but they responded in Game 2 of the Western Conference Finals.
After they dropped the first game of the series, Houston evened things up at one apiece Wednesday night with a 127-105 blowout win over Golden State. With the Warriors struggling on the offensive end and Houston rebounding from a less than stellar Game 1, the Rockets rolled through the game with relative ease.
But was their improved demonstration a fluke? While fans may not want to hear it, Game 2 may have been the perfect storm for Houston.
The Rockets’ gameplan didn’t change much from Game 1 to 2. They attacked Steph Curry relentlessly on the offensive end, James Harden and Chris Paul took plenty of shots in isolation and their role players got shots to drop that just weren’t going down in Game 1. Eric Gordon, Trevor Ariza and P.J. Tucker exploded for 68 points while shooting 66.7 percent from three after scoring just 24 the previous game. The trio averaged only 35.8 points collectively during the regular season.
Meanwhile, Golden State couldn’t buy a bucket; starting Warriors not named Kevin Durant scored just 35 points. Curry shot just 1-8 from downtown while Klay Thompson, Draymond Green and Andre Iguadola combined for just 19 points while shooting 35 percent from the floor. All of that will undoubtedly change.
So, going back to Oakland for Game 3, where do the Rockets find themselves? Not in a great place, unfortunately.
Golden State did their job: they stole a game — and home-court advantage — from the Rockets at the Toyota Center. Now, as the series shifts back to Oracle Arena and, assuming the Warriors return to form in front of their home crowd, Houston will have their work more than cut out for them. If Curry, Thompson and Durant all have their shot falling, there isn’t much the Rockets can do to keep up
The Warriors, aside from Curry, played great team defense in Game 2, something that will likely continue into Game 3. The Rockets hit plenty of tough, contested shots — shots that won’t drop as they move away from the energy of the home crowd and shots that Golden State would gladly have Houston take again and again and again. Harden and Paul didn’t exactly bring their A-game in Game 2 either — the two combined for a solid 43 points but took an inefficient 38 shots to get there. If the two of them play like that at Oracle, the Warriors will abuse them in transition, something that can’t happen if the Rockets want to steal back the home-court advantage.
The aforementioned trio of Gordon, Ariza and Tucker are unlikely to replicate their Game 2 performance as well, and relying on them to do so would be foolish on the part of Rockets head coach Mike D’Antoni. Devising a game plan that will keep the offense moving while not leaning heavily on the role players will be of the utmost importance — if the offense returns to the bogged down effort that Houston gave in Game 1, the Rockets stand no chance.
Meanwhile, Warriors head coach Steve Kerr will likely adjust his defense in an effort to limit the Rockets effectiveness in the isolation while also trying to find somewhere to hide Curry on the defensive end. It almost certainly won’t be the same sets that Houston throttled in Game 2 which will take another toll on the Rockets offense, especially if they fail to execute.
Not everything looks bad for Houston, however. Faced with a do-or-die scenario, Harden, Paul and co. were the more aggressive team from the jump. Pushing the pace flustered the Warriors and forced some pretty bad turnovers consistently throughout the night. If they come out with the same kind of energy and pace, the Rockets could have Golden State on their heels as they did in Game 2.
Budding star Clint Capela also has plenty of room to improve his game, as he has averaged just 8.5 points and eight rebounds through the first two games of the series — the Rockets need him to play his best basketball of the season if they want a chance to win.
Still, the Warriors are virtually unbeatable at home. The team has lost three games this postseason, just four times over their last two playoff trips and not once at Oracle, making the Rockets’ task even more daunting than it already was. Like Game 2, Game 3 should be played as a do-or-die situation for the Rockets because, if they don’t come out with the same aggressive, up-tempo energy, things could be over quickly.
NBA Daily: Hope Not Lost for Mavs
The Dallas Mavericks were the lottery’s biggest losers, but VP of basketball operations Michael Finley still believes the team will land an elite talent.
Dallas Mavericks vice president of basketball operations Michael Finley knows what it’s like to be on the other side of the draft process. In 2018, he’s an executive for the third-worst team in the league that somehow slipped to the fifth overall pick in Tuesday night’s NBA Draft Lottery, but in 1995 he was a kid from the University of Wisconsin hoping to get drafted.
Finley was a first-round pick that summer, ironically selected by the Phoenix Suns, who won the first overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft earlier this week, but he says he doesn’t even remember the lottery. The lottery wasn’t the event then that it has since become.
“The lottery wasn’t this big when I was in the draft,” Finley told Basketball Insiders. “I don’t even remember how the lottery process played out when I was coming out of college. It’s grown so much, but the league has grown. It’s good for fans, and it’s good for people to get excited about this process.”
Of course, the irony in getting excited about a draft pick isn’t lost on him.
“It’s kind of weird that [fans] are celebrating the losing process, isn’t it?”
Not surprisingly, Finley wasn’t especially thrilled to see his team fail to reap the rewards of a Dallas Mavericks season that was stepped in that losing process. The lottery odds will change next year, and Finley believes that’s a good thing.
“It’s a good thing to change the system a little,” he says. “It will help keep the integrity of the game intact, especially toward the end of the year. It also will be even more suspenseful than these lottery events have been in the past.”
That’s next year, though. This year, the Mavericks are tasked with finding an elite player at a pick lower than they expected. Finley’s trying to look at things optimistically.
“It could have been sixth,” he said. “It’s still in the top five, and going on what we did this season, we don’t want to be in this position next year, so hopefully the guy we pick at #5 will get us out of the lottery and back into the playoffs.”
In fact, having that selection doesn’t preclude the team from finding a star, especially in a draft this loaded. Most agree that Luka Doncic and DeAndre Ayton are the prizes of the draft, but there are other guys available with All-Star potential. Marvin Bagley, Trae Young, Michael Porter, Jr., and Mo Bamba all have incredibly high ceilings. The Mavs may yet do something meaningful with that selection.
“It’s a strong draft, and a lot of the draft is going to go with what player fits what team in a particular system. If you’re lucky enough to get that perfect combination, the players that are in this draft are really good and have the capability of helping a team right away.”
That’s what Finley and the rest of the Mavericks’ organization hopes will happen in 2018-2019.
Mock Drafts4 days ago
2018 NBA Consensus Mock Draft – Ver 3.0
Mock Drafts5 days ago
NBA Daily: 2018 60-Pick NBA Mock Draft – 5/15/18
NBA7 days ago
NBA Daily: David Fizdale, the Draft Lottery, and Turning the Tide in New York
NBA4 days ago
NBA Daily: Celtics’ Draft Gambles Have Paid Off Astronomically