With a mere 20 games to go in the regular season, Russell Westbrook remains on the verge of doing the impossible. Having amassed a total of 30 triple-doubles on the season, Westbrook has turned in the third-most triple-doubles in a single season in NBA history, trailing only Wilt Chamberlain (who amassed 31 triple-doubles in the 1967-68 season) and Oscar Robertson, whose 41 triple-doubles accumulated during the 1961-62 season remains the all-time record.
Sure, Westbrook is the contemporary NBA’s unquestioned king of the triple-double, but is he the league’s Most Valuable Player?
In a word: Yes.
* * * * * *
As the 2016-17 NBA season winds down, with all due respect to LeBron James and Isaiah Thomas, the race for the league’s Most Valuable Player Award is one between two horses—Westbrook and James Harden. Harden has turned in an absolutely remarkable season that has seen his Houston Rockets make an improbable rise to the third seed in the Western Conference. Without question, he warrants serious consideration.
Without Harden and his mind-numbing per-game averages of 28.8 points, 8.0 rebounds and 11.3 assists, the Rockets would probably be a lottery team. But the debate as to whether or not Harden or Westbrook ends up winning the MVP Award will boil down to two questions.
The first is to what extent people (especially the voters) give reverence to history, while the second is whether or not the league’s decision to make the voting results public was actually in the best interest in the integrity of the awards processes. The latter may end up having unintended consequences. Consider the latter first.
Last season, en route to helping to lead the Golden State Warriors to a record-breaking 73 regular season wins, Stephen Curry became the first unanimous MVP in NBA history. To that point, there had never been a unanimous MVP, and that’s noteworthy, to say the least. That Curry was able to do something that all-time greats including Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Michael Jordan, Karl Malone, Shaquille O’Neal and Tim Duncan wasn’t was head-scratching to a great many. To understand how this happened, though, one would need to understand the voting process and the psychology that goes into casting a vote.
Back in 2013, as a member of the Miami HEAT, LeBron James won his fourth MVP Award in five seasons. The HEAT was defending NBA Champions and had just turned in a 66-16 regular season. James shot 56.5 percent from the field for the season—a career-best at the time. With 26.8 points, 8.0 rebounds and 7.3 assists per game, in leading the HEAT to the league’s best regular season record, James appeared to be a shoe-in for the MVP Award. He was the obvious choice.
For most people, anyway.
When the NBA released the results of the MVP vote, it was revealed that James received 120 of the 121 first-place votes, meaning that one voter stood between him and his earning the honor of being the first unanimous winner in history. There was an immediate outcry from the voting and non-voting media, as everyone questioned how another member of the media could vote for anyone other than James. Without much suspense, Gary Washburn—a veteran and well-respected journalist who covers the NBA and the Boston Celtics for the Boston Globe—publicly explained why he voted for Carmelo Anthony. Washburn’s decision got so much attention that he was invited to ESPN’s Sports Center to explain his decision, which he did.
In short, Washburn explained that his voting for Anthony was simply because Anthony had taken the Knicks to new heights. He correctly pointed out that the franchise had been a laughingstock over the previous 10 years.
“I just felt like he was the Most Valuable Player, obviously, on his team and to his team,” Washburn said at the time. “If this was a best player of the league award, LeBron James wins this every year, we know that.”
Washburn’s voting for Anthony was absolutely defensible and extremely reasonable. Under no obligation to do so, Washburn also deserves credit for publicly coming out as the lone voter who didn’t select James as his first candidate for MVP. Despite being well-reasoned and informed, though, Washburn probably knew that once he revealed himself as the lone holdout, he was going to be second-guessed for his decision.
Perhaps it was only a coincidence, but the very next season, the NBA had decided that it would make the end-of-season ballots public. The decision was in line with Adam Silver’s declaration to have a league whose inner-workings were more transparent, but now, instead of having the decision to out themselves (or not), all voting members would potentially face the same scrutiny and second-guessing as Washburn.
While making the voting results public would certainly dissuade someone from casting an indefensible token vote for a player with whom they have a relationship (this has happened many times in the past), the unintended consequence could be that voters will subscribe to a herd mentality.
In all seriousness, with the knowledge that their vote would be made public, which member of the media would have wanted to take the risk of voting for anyone other than Stephen Curry last season? Would other members of the media want to face the same second-guessing and scrutiny as Washburn? Of course, there’s no guarantee that a public ballot would dissuade someone from casting a vote they felt strongly about—especially if the vote were cast in good faith. The only question is whether or not a public ballot makes it more likely that a voter will fall in line with their peers out of a want to avoid ridicule.
Simple human nature suggests that it could.
* * * * * *
In a perfect world, Westbrook and Harden would become the first co-MVPs in NBA league history, but it’s not likely to happen.
As fans of the game, ask yourself an important question: Why do you watch?
Some watch because they’re bored, while others watch because they like to witness competition. A great many others watch (and continue to watch) because they like to see history made.
If the Warriors didn’t win 73 games last season, Curry would not have been the unanimous MVP. He would have still won the award, but there would have been at least a few voting members that would have opted to go elsewhere. That’s because a great many that watch the game do so because of their want to witness and be apart of history. A great many watch the game because they want to see Reggie Miller score eight points in nine seconds or Tracy McGrady score 13 points in 33.
Many watch because they want to see LeBron James score 45 points in a do-or-die Game 6 against the Boston Celtics. Many watch because they want to see Kobe Bryant score 60 points in the final game of his career, or Kyrie Irving make one of the biggest three-point shots in history.
And best believe, many are watching this season because they want to see Russell Westbrook accomplish something that hasn’t been done in nearly 60 years.
With only 20 games remaining in the 2016-17 NBA season, Westbrook needs 157 rebounds and 192 assists to finish the season with per-game averages of 10 rebounds and 10 assists. In other words, over his final 20 games of the season, Westbrook needs to average 7.9 rebounds per game and 9.6 assists per game to accomplish the feat.
If he does so and the Thunder manage to win somewhere between 45 and 50 games, it’d be wise to bet on him winning the NBA’s 2017 MVP Award. From Kevin Durant leaving to his decision to remain in Oklahoma City to accomplishing the unthinkable, the reasons to vote for Westbrook are a bit too numerous to ignore.
It’s no fault of Harden; there’s just a great many that watch the game because they want to see history made. And Westbrook is on the cusp of delivering it.
If he does, in the eyes of many, not voting for him becomes borderline indefensible.
Don’t hate the player, hate the game. Or, if you wish, hate the combination of a reverence for history and the league’s decision to go to an open ballot.
G-League Watch: 10-Day Contracts
David Yapkowitz looks at five potential G-League callups for 10-day contracts.
Since Jan. 10, NBA teams have been able to sign players from the G-League to ten-day contracts. A few have already been signed, such as DeAndre Liggins with the Milwaukee Bucks and Kyle Collinsworth with the Dallas Mavericks.
Once a ten-day contract expires, teams have the option of signing that player to another ten-day contract. After the second ten-day, teams must either sign the player for the remainder of the season or release that player.
Some players have used ten-day contracts to essentially jump-start their careers. Bruce Bowen was once a ten-day contract player before becoming a key piece of multiple championship teams in San Antonio. Famed New York Knicks enforcer Anthony Mason also got his first chance in the league off a ten-day contract.
With a few guys already being called up via ten-day as well as the NBA’s new two-way contracts, here’s a look at some of the remaining names who might be next in line.
1. Christian Wood
Christian Wood was once a highly touted prospect coming out of high school. He played two college seasons at UNLV before declaring for the NBA draft in 2015. Despite being projected to be drafted late in the first round or early second round, he did not hear his name called on draft night. He’s spent some time in the NBA since then, with the Philadelphia 76ers and Charlotte Hornets, but he currently plays for the Delaware 87ers, the Sixers G-League affiliate.
His 22.0 points per game are tied with James Young for top scorer on the team. He’s shooting 53.9 percent from the field, and he’s also displayed a nice outside touch for a big man at 35.2 percent from three-point range. He leads the team in rebounds at 9.6, as well as in blocked shots with 2.0. He’s very mobile and could certainly help a team as a stretch big man who can play defense and crash the glass.
2. Jameel Warney
Jameel Warney has been a candidate for an NBA call-up for quite some time. The former Stony Brook standout had a big summer with Team USA basketball. He was the tournament MVP of the 2017 FIBA Americup and was named USA Basketball Male Athlete of the Year for 2017. He got as far as training camp/preseason with the Dallas Mavericks in 2016, and he’s currently playing for their G-League affiliate, the Texas Legends.
With the Legends, he’s fourth on the team in scoring with 19.4 points per game. He’s second on the team in rebounding with 10.4, and he’s tied with Johnathan Motley leading the team in blocked shots with 1.5. He’s shooting 52.5 percent from the field. What could be hindering his NBA chances is his lack of an outside shot, especially with the way the game is being played today. Nonetheless, he’s still one of the G-League’s top players and he deserves a shot in the big leagues.
3. Melo Trimble
After a solid three years at the University of Maryland, Melo Trimble was one of the best players not selected in this past summer’s draft. He played well for the 76ers’ summer league team in Las Vegas, which in turn earned him an invite to training camp with the Minnesota Timberwolves. He ended up being one of their final cuts at the end of preseason, and he went on to join their G-League affiliate, the Iowa Wolves.
He’s third on the Wolves in scoring with 18.5 points per game. He’s shooting 44 percent from the field, and a decent 34 percent from beyond the arc. He’s also leading the team in assists per game with 5.7. He’s got the potential to be a decent backup point guard, and if he can get his shooting numbers, especially from three-point range, up a little bit, there’s no question he’s NBA caliber.
4. Joel Bolomboy
Joel Bolomboy is a name that should be familiar to Utah Jazz fans. He was drafted by the Jazz in 2016, and although relegated to mostly end of the bench duty, he showed a bit of potential and flash here and there. The Jazz cut him after a year, and he ended up in Milwaukee before they too cut him to make room for Sean Kilpatrick. He’s currently playing for the Wisconsin Herd, the Bucks G-League affiliate.
At the recent G-League Showcase that took place from Jan. 10-13, Bolomboy had one of the best performances of the event. In the two games played, he averaged 25.5 points per game on 73 percent shooting from the field and 13.0 rebounds. He was named to the All-Showcase First Team. He’s had eight double-doubles so far in the G-League this season. He’s already gotten his feet wet in the NBA, and if he continues putting up similar production, it won’t be long before he finds himself back on an NBA roster.
5. Jeremy Evans
Jeremy Evans is a name that should be somewhat familiar to NBA fans. He’s spent six years in the league with the Utah Jazz and Dallas Mavericks. He also participated in two dunk contests in 2012 and 2013. Unfortunately for him, dunking was probably the one thing he was known for. It might be why he found himself out of the league after only six years.
With the Erie Bay Hawks, the Atlanta Hawks G-League affiliate, his 15.9 points per game are good enough for fourth on the team. His 62.3 percent shooting from the field is a team-high, as is his 10.3 rebounds per game, and 1.4 blocks. Not known as a shooter during his time in the NBA, he’s only shooting 25.6 percent from three-point range in the G-League. If he can get his outside shooting percentages up, he has a shot at getting an NBA call-up and keeping that spot permanently.
Although there’s no guarantee that any of these guys get NBA call-ups on ten-day contracts, they have some of the best shots out of anyone in the G-League. Don’t be surprised if, by the end of the season, all of these guys finish it out on an NBA roster.
NBA Daily: Potential Trade Targets to Get the Sixers to the Playoffs
On the cusp of a playoff appearance for the first time in six years, the Philadelphia 76ers could cement their postseason status with a move at the trade deadline.
At times this season, the Philadelphia 76ers look like they’re capable of going toe-to-toe with some of the league’s best teams. With Joel Embiid and Ben Simmons at their disposal, along with capable three-point shooters, the Sixers have shown flashes of being a force to be reckoned with.
And at other times, well, they look like a discombobulated young team, with serious flaws in the construction of its roster.
Despite the lapses they display, the Sixers are still right in the thick of the playoff race. Currently, at 21-20, they hold a half-game advantage over the Detroit Pistons for the No. 8 spot in the Eastern Conference.
While they await the return of top overall pick Markelle Fultz, who has still yet to hit the court after being shut down earlier this season with a shoulder injury, the Sixers will continue to miss depth on the wing and a particular skill set that holds them back from winning games they seem to have locked up with double-digit leads. For all the greatness that is Embiid, and all of the promise that is Simmons, when the former isn’t on the court, the latter struggles to shoulder the scoring load due to his inability to shoot jump shots.
Initially, that’s what Fultz was drafted for. A player that head coach Brett Brown has said many times before, has the talent to tie everything together with the Sixers’ roster. What he means by that is Fultz represents a scorer from multiple levels of the court who forces the defense to lock in on, potentially leaving the teams’ shooters open on the wing.
Without Fultz, and when Embiid is on the bench, the team lacks a player who can put the ball on the floor, create and knock down jumpers. Although long-term success is still very much the attention for Philadelphia, that doesn’t discount the fact that a team that finished with 10 wins just two seasons ago is on the verge of making a playoff appearance for the first time since 2011-12 with a core of young, promising players.
Because of that possibility, and because of the clear holes in team’s makeup that could prevent this from happening, the Sixers could become an interesting player at the trade deadline — especially considering the names that appear available, according to reports.
It’s no secret that Sixers’ president of basketball operations Bryan Colangelo wants to keep financial flexibility heading into this summer, that’s the main reason players like J.J. Redick and Amir Johnson were signed to one-year deals last offseason. Before the team has to start signing their own players to big extensions, the Sixers are in a unique position where they not only have elite homegrown talent, but the money to complement those players the best they can. Because of that, any deal that would return a player with money on the books past this season seems unlikely.
That being said, it just so happens that two players potentially on the trading block right now fulfill the Sixers’ most crucial need, and also aren’t on the hook for money past this year. Marc Stein of The New York Times reported that Rodney Hood could be moved before the Feb. 8 trade deadline, and that multiple teams are expressing interest in his services.
Along with Hood, Stein also reported that Lou Williams, who’s been the center of many trade talks around the league given his career-year and impending free agent status, was involved in specific discussions that would send him to the Cleveland Cavaliers.
What should intrigue the Sixers about these two players is not only their ability on the court but also their flexibility off of it.
Let’s start with Hood. Before the rise of Donovan Mitchell this season, Hood looked to be in a position to assume the role as the dominant scorer on the Utah Jazz following Gordon Hayward’s departure. At just 25 years old and in the final year of his rookie contract, Hood may not be worth the price tag for Utah this summer considering their find with Mitchell.
Should the Jazz actually move on from Hood, it’s unclear what they would ask for in return at this point. Yes, Hood his an impending free agent, which could diminish his value. But the team trading for him would assume his Bird Rights, therefore giving them a better shot at retaining him this summer should they choose to do so.
The best part about his potential fit in Philadelphia is that he fits the timeline of the rebuild while also addressing a need in the present. Being just 25, Hood fits alongside the core of Embiid, Simmons, Fultz, Dario Saric and Robert Covington as a young player. If the Sixers were to miss out on whoever they were planning to target with their financial flexibility this summer, Hood would still be there to plug in for years with a contract extension.
Shooting 38 percent from beyond the arc this season, and displaying the track record of being able to fill up the score sheet, Hood could become the go-to-scorer for Philadelphia when Embiid isn’t on the court, or late in games when they need to stop an opposing team’s run.
While he appears to at least be on the table as of now, Hood is certainly worth checking in on from the Sixers’ standpoint.
Now, onto Williams. Drafted by Philadelphia all the back in 2005 with the 45th overall pick, Williams is enjoying the best season of his career for the Los Angeles Clippers. At 31, he doesn’t represent the long-term upside that Hood does, but for this season alone, bringing Williams on to this current Sixers’ roster could be that extra jolt to get them cleanly into the postseason.
Averaging 23 points per game and shooting 41 percent from downtown, Williams fits the role as an iso-scorer better than any player on the Sixers’ current roster. Alongside Simmons and Embiid, Williams could assume the role Fultz was supposed to this season.
Another interesting ripple to the potential Williams fit is that he was on the last Sixers’ roster to make the playoffs. Adding him to this roster would bring his career full circle. This summer, Williams is most likely going to test the market and given his age and potential price tag he may not fit so well into the Sixers’ plans moving forward. But with his history with the club and city, getting him on board for another playoff run with an exciting young team could arguably help in the negotiation process this offseason.
Neither of these potential trades are slam dunks, and it remains to be seen if either player will even be moved. But for where the Sixers stand currently, coupled with their growing postseason expectations, checking in around the league on trade targets that can fulfill obvious needs should be at the forefront of Colangelo’s agenda for the next few weeks.
Payton Blocking Out Trade Talk, Believes Magic Will Turn It Around
Spencer Davies sits down with Elfrid Payton to discuss his fourth year, trade rumors and a trying season for Orlando in a Basketball Insiders exclusive.
It’s hard for a team to look for positives when it’s living in the basement.
The Orlando Magic have had a rough go of it this year. They’re 13-32 at the bottom of the Eastern Conference, they’ve have had a ton of setbacks, and they currently rank 29th in the NBA in defensive rating.
There is a bright spot hidden in there, though, and head coach Frank Vogel sees it growing as the season progresses.
“We’re frustrated with our record, but we’re encouraged with the development we’ve had with our young players,” Vogel said before Thursday’s game in Cleveland. “Aaron Gordon, Mario [Hezonja], and [Elfrid Payton] have all had strong individual seasons and continue to get better. All those guys are improving individually and at some point, it’s gonna lead to more Ws.”
While Gordon stands out more to some than the others because of his star appeal, Payton is right up there with him as far as making the next step goes.
“Elfrid’s shooting the ball better from the perimeter and at the rim,” Vogel said. “He’s worked on his left hand. He’s worked on his floaters. Shooting 52 percent from the field and that’s pretty darn good for a point guard, and the 39 percent from the three as well.”
Those are your more traditional statistics that don’t address the leap he’s taken in efficiency. Sure, Payton’s scoring the same amount of points per game, but it’s the way he’s been getting that’s been most noticeable.
According to Basketball-Reference and NBA.com, he’s making nearly 70 percent of his tries between 0-3 feet and ranks third among point guards in restricted field goal percentage (min. four attempts).
But Payton doesn’t like to evaluate himself using numbers, so he doesn’t know how to feel about how he’s played for Orlando this year.
“It’s tough to say because I like to measure my success by winning and we haven’t been doing that,” Payton told Basketball Insiders. “So tough to say.”
He’s not kidding. Since starting out the season 8-4, the Magic have taken a hard fall, only winning five games since November 10. In this stretch, there have been three hefty losing streaks—two 9-game slides and most recently a 7-game skid.
“Not to make excuses—we had a lot of injuries,” Payton told Basketball Insiders of what happened. “Haven’t really been playing with the group of guys that we started the season with, so kinda derailed us a little bit.”
As the losses pile up, so does the chatter. Indicated by multiple recent reports, Orlando has made it clear that many players on the roster are available on the trade block. Evan Fournier, Mario Hezonja, and Payton were recently brought up as names who could possibly on the move if the right deal presents itself.
When asked about the rumblings, Vogel claimed he doesn’t have a message for his guys.
“They understand it’s part of the business,” he said. “Just focus on playing the game.”
Like his coach, Payton doesn’t have a reaction to the noise.
“I don’t get caught up into the things like that,” Payton told Basketball Insiders. “Today I’m an Orlando Magic. I play for the Orlando Magic and I’m gonna give them 100 percent of me. I’m somebody that likes to finish what I started, so I definitely would like to see this through and try to turn this organization around.”
So who does he see on this team that can help jump-start the process in flipping the script?
“Everybody,” Payton told Basketball Insiders. “I like Vuc. I like AG. Evan [Fournier] is somebody who can fill it up. T Ross is somebody who can fill it up when healthy. I think we have a lot of talent on this team. Even the rookies—Wes [Iwundu] plays well for us in stretches. Jon [Isaac] when he was playing he’d do well.
“You could see the potential there. So I think we have a lot of weapons on this team. I’m very confident in the group we have here. I think we have a lot of talent, we just have to do it.”
Saying you’re going to right the ship is one thing. Actually doing it is a whole other challenge. With where the Magic sit in the standings currently, their work is cut out for them. That being said, Payton isn’t giving up.
In fact, he’s still got his eyes on making it to the postseason, and it starts with him.
“Definitely trying to get a run going,” Payton told Basketball Insiders. “Make a playoff push. It’s definitely not out of sight right now, especially with the way the East is. We win a few games and we right back in the thick of things.
“Do whatever I can to help us to get more wins, man. I think that’s what it all boils down to. I figure if I’m playing well, that means we’re winning for the most part.”
Defense matters the most, and it’s something Payton and his group know they need to get better at if they have a chance to play past mid-April.
“Just be tied in together a little bit more,” Payton told Basketball Insiders. “I think sometimes we have too many breakdowns on the backside. So just being more in-tune with each other.”
One thing is for sure—Orlando is going through this difficult time as a team, but refuses to fold. Payton says Vogel has constantly stayed in their ears with uplifting advice.
“Keep fighting,” Payton told Basketball Insiders of his words. “Don’t feel sorry for yourself. No one’s gonna feel sorry for you, so just keep fighting.”