Connect with us

NBA

NBA Sunday: Are the Bucks Contenders?

It’s not a matter of IF the Milwaukee Bucks will win the Eastern Conference, it’s WHEN, writes Moke Hamilton.

Moke Hamilton

Published

on

The calendar turns to September and NBA lifers officially begin to think about the upcoming season. As fans continue to bide time until training camp and preseason play begins, we spend copious amounts of time thinking about what transpired over this past offseason and, more importantly, what could lay ahead for this coming season.

One thing I am expecting, personally, is for the Milwaukee Bucks to emerge as a legitimate contender in the Eastern Conference. This coming season, so long as health permits, the Bucks will take a significant stride forward. And if things break right for them, who knows how far they could go? After all, nobody thought that the Atlanta Hawks would have had a chance at winning 60 games entering last season, but look at what happened there.

The Bucks have everything they need to make some serious noise, and they have it at this very moment.

Fear the deer.

* * * * *

Call it a coincidence if you would like, but I’m not going that route. As I have recently said in relation to Fred Hoiberg succeeding Tom Thibodeau in Chicago and Steve Kerr becoming the first rookie head coach to lead his team to the championship since Pat Riley did it in 1982, the right head coach makes all the difference in the world in the NBA.

First and foremost, a team’s featured player and the head coach need one another. They depend on one another in the same way that peanut butter needs jelly. Asking Jason Kidd to command the respect of Deron Williams, Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett was a losing proposition. Those three saw Kidd as more of a peer than an authority figure, and from what I hear, his attempts at enacting “player friendly” policies were seen as weakness on his part.

Similarly, asking a player like Derek Fisher to be taken seriously and to reprimand the likes of Carmelo Anthony—it is not a wise decision. Fisher has proven nothing as a head coach and, in Anthony’s mind, the Knicks revolve around a franchise player, not a franchise coach.

Few coaches rise to the level of being a franchise coach, especially considering that only three coaches in the entire league have been in their current job for at least five years: Gregg Popovich (20), Erik Spoelstra (eight) and Frank Vogel (six).

Pat Riley, Phil Jackson, Jerry Sloan, Gregg Popovich and perhaps Spoelstra are on the short list, but the main point is this: in the NBA, requiring a player to subjugate his personal agenda and desires to a head coach who has proven less than he has, as a player, is an almost impossible task.

Coaches that are wet behind the ears need to be handed a roster full of youngsters whose potential is still untapped, and in that regard, Kidd hit the jackpot in Milwaukee. In Brooklyn, he was saddled with a roster of old veterans who were not interested in doing things his way or subscribing to his philosophies, and why would they? Everyone within Mikhail Prokhorov’s reach was paid handsomely. With multi-year contracts and millions of dollars, where was the incentive?

The youngsters that Kidd have in front of him respect him and what he has accomplished during his long and illustrious career. And since they themselves have not come close to accomplishing anything in the same category, to a man, they will run through a wall for him.

It is, after all, much easier to trust someone to lead you to a place when you have no idea how to get there.

Aside from that, the main part of the reason that the Bucks and Kidd had eyes for each other was the pre-existing relationship between Bucks co-owner Marc Lasry and Kidd. Lasry and Kidd became close when Lasry was a minority owner of the then New Jersey Nets many moons ago, and it was Lasry who was the driving force behind Kidd making his way to Milwaukee—a process that began while Larry Drew was still employed by the team.

In short, expect Kidd to enjoy substantial security and loyalty from the front office in Milwaukee, especially after helping the team go from a 15-win cellar dweller to a 41-win darling. And that happened in just one season.

But as for Kidd? Yeah, I’d say he traded up.

* * * * *

Another man who traded up would be Greg Monroe.

Monroe entered the offseason as one of the most coveted free agents on the market. Since November, I had been hearing that Monroe would ultimately wind up in New York, and that was an account that was eventually echoed by the New York Daily News.

Then, surprisingly, after a source in Detroit assured me that Monroe would not be re-signing with the team, news broke that it was the Bucks who had won the bid for the 25-year-old center on a three-year maximum contract worth $50 million.

Monroe joins Kidd and an impressive array of mostly young players who, last season, managed to increase the team’s 2013-14 win total by 26 games. The core players for the Bucks may not be household names, but to a man, they are impressive, plus-contributors on the NBA level. And collectively, they form a team that plays for one another and contains complementary pieces. That is the reason why the Monroe acquisition was tremendous.

Monroe gives the Bucks a legitimate low-post threat that can both create opportunities for himself or for his teammates. With Jabari Parker returning to the lineup, Michael Carter-Williams handling the ball and the 20-year-old Giannis Antetokounmpo emerging as an impressively versatile force, these four form a conglomerate that has the potential to be scary good. What’s ever scarier about these four is that the 25-year-old Monroe is the oldest of the bunch. Combined, they average just 22 years of age.

And the best part of all? We already know that they can play.

Therein lies an important distinction, though: we already know that they can play. What you should probably know about the Bucks, however, is that they have two other players who are exceptional young talents, but because of a lack of national television appearances, you probably don’t know it.

Khris Middleton started 58 games for the 41-win Bucks last season and turned in the best per-36 minute averages of his young career. In his third season, the 24-year-old gave Kidd 16 points, 5.3 rebounds, 2.8 assists and 1.8 steals while converting about 41 percent of his three-point looks. At Kidd’s urging, the Bucks signed Middleton to a five-year, $70 million extension this past summer. Middleton was arguably the most consistent offensive force on last season’s team and is an underrated two-way player. While he may never become an All-Star, he is a surefire starting-caliber shooting guard in the NBA. Think of guys like Wesley Matthews and Arron Afflalo. For my money, today, I take Middleton over either of them and it’s not close.

John Henson, another 24-year-old, was a dominant force on the defensive end for the Bucks last season. While not possessing the same kind of game-changing ability as Middleton, Henson gave the Bucks 13.8 points and 9.1 rebounds per-36 minutes last season. Most impressively, though, were the four blocks per-36 minutes he gave his team. If there is one critique about Greg Monroe, it is that he is not exactly a defensive stalwart. Henson, in many ways, will be the perfect complement.

Sprinkle in a few veterans such as O.J. Mayo, Greivis Vasquez and Jerryd Bayless and combine them with a few other youngsters in Miles Plumlee and Tyler Ennis, and all of a sudden, you will find yourself looking at the 10-man rotation that Kidd will deploy during the 2015-16 season and, without a question, furrow your brow.

That is especially so when one considers that both Monroe and Parker are being added to a team that won 41 games last season, without them.

* * * * *

Andrew Wiggins is the reigning Rookie of the Year, and for good reason. But there are a great number of scouts who believe that Parker will ultimately be the better professional. Aside from the Grant Hill comparisons, after having a few conversations with Parker, I can at least attest to his positive attitude and confident demeanor.

It’s not necessary to extol his virtues here, but know this: he is every bit as legit as any other impressive 22-year-old in the NBA today.

As you look around the Eastern Conference, obviously, the Cleveland Cavaliers stand almost head and shoulders above all other challengers. Around the rest of the conference, however, there are questions.

Can Fred Hoiberg lead the Chicago Bulls to higher heights?

Have the Washington Wizards grown enough to take the next step?

How much will the Atlanta Hawks miss DeMarre Carroll?

Will the Toronto Raptors never be anything more than a first round loser?

Is Paul George going to revert to pre-injury form? How will his Indiana Pacers fare without Roy Hibbert, David West and Lance Stephenson?

Does Dwyane Wade have enough left in his tank to restore the Miami HEAT as legitimate contenders?

Yes, there are questions aplenty in the Eastern Conference. So while we are here, I pose another one: why can’t the Milwaukee Bucks emerge as one of the top teams out East?

It’s not a matter of if the Milwaukee Bucks will win the Eastern Conference, it’s when.

Advertisement




1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Pingback: Starting 5 - Tyson Chandler's Value - Today's Fastbreak

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NBA

Reviewing the Nurkic Trade: Denver’s Perspective

The Denver Nuggets have been on a miraculous run this postseason, but that doesn’t mean that they’re infallible. Drew Maresca reviews the 2017 trade that sent Jusuf Nurkic from Denver to Portland.

Drew Maresca

Published

on

The Denver Nuggets are fresh off of a 114-106 win over the Los Angeles Lakers in the Western Conference Finals, pulling within three wins of the franchise’s first trip to the NBA Finals. But what if I told you that the Nuggets’ roster could be even more talented by acting more deliberately in a trade from three years ago?

While Denver won on Tuesday night, they lost a nail bitter on Sunday – for which most of the blame has been pointed at a defensive breakdown by Nuggets’ center Mason Plumlee, who was procured in the aforementioned 2017 trade. What did it cost Denver, you ask? Just Jusuf Nurkic and a first-round pick.

Nurkic was a 2014-15 All-Rookie second team member. He played 139 games over 2.5 seasons in Denver, averaging 7.5 points and 5.9 rebounds in approximately 18 minutes per game. He showed serious promise, but Denver had numerous reasons to pursue a trade: he’d suffered a few relatively serious injuries early in his career (and he’s continued to be injury-prone in Portland), butted heads with head coach Michael Malone and – most importantly – the Nuggets stumbled on to Nikola Jokic.

The Nuggets eventually attempted a twin-tower strategy with both in the starting line-up, but that experiment was short-lived — with Jokic ultimately asking to move to the team’s second unit.

The Nuggets traded Nurkic to the Portland Trail Blazers in February 2017 (along with a first-round pick) in exchange for Plumlee, a second-round pick and cash considerations. Ironically, the first-round pick included in the deal became Justin Jackson, who was used to procure another center, Zach Collins – but more on that in a bit.

As of February 2017, Plumlee was considered the better player of the two. He was averaging a career-high 11 points, 8.1 rebounds and 4.0 assists through 54 games – but it was clear that at 27, he’d already maximized his talent.

Conversely, Nurkic was only 23 at the time of the trade with significant, untapped upside. In his first few seasons with Portland, Nurkic averaged 15 points and 9.8 rebounds per game, while establishing himself as a rising star. As noted above, injuries have continued to be a problem. Nurkic suffered a compound fracture in his tibia and fibula in March 2019, forcing him to miss a majority of this current campaign. The COVID-19-related play stoppage in March gave Nurkic extra time to get his body right, and he returned to action in July inside the bubble.

And he did so with a vengeance. Nurkic demonstrated superior strength and footwork, and he flashed the dominance that Portland hoped he would develop, posting eight double-doubles in 18 contests. He averaged 17.6 points and 10.3 rebounds per game and while his play dipped a bit in the playoffs – partially due to a matchup with first-team All-NBA star Anthony Davis – he still managed 14.2 points and 10.4 rebounds in the five-game series. So it’s fair to say that Nurkic is still on his way toward stardom.

But the Nuggets are in the conference finals – so all’s well that ends well, right? Not so fast. To his credit, Plumlee is exactly who Denver expected him to be. He’s averaged 7.5 points and 5.5 rebounds per game in three seasons with Denver since 2017 – but to be fair, Plumlee is asked to do less in Denver than he had in Portland. Still, it’s fairly obvious that they’re just not that comparable.

Plumlee is a good passer and an above-average defender that’ll compete hard and isn’t afraid to get dirty – but he has limitations. He doesn’t stretch the floor and he is a sub-par free throw shooter (53.5 percent in 2019-20). More importantly, he’s simply not a major offensive threat and his repertoire of moves is limited.

High-level takeaway: Defenses tend to game plan for opponents they view as major threats – Nurkic falls into this category. Other guys pack the stat sheet through putback attempts, open looks and single coverage alongside the guys for whom opposing defenses game plan – that’s a more appropriate description of Plumlee.

On to the wrench thrown in by Zach Collins’ involvement. Statistically, Collins is about as effective as Plumlee – he averaged 7 points and 6.3 rebounds through only 11 games in 2019-20 due to various injuries – and he possesses more upside. The 22-year-old is not as reliable as Plumlee but given his age and skill set, he’s a far better option as a support player playing off the bench. He stretches the floor (36.8 percent on three-point attempts in 2019-20), is an above-average free throw shooter (75 percent this season) and is a good defender. Looking past Nurkic for a moment, would the Nuggets prefer a 22-year-old center that stretches the floor and defends or a 30-year-old energy guy?

Regardless of your answer to that question, it’s hard to argue that Nurkic should have returned more than Plumlee, definitely so when you factor in the first-round pick Denver included. There is obviously more at play: Denver was probably considering trading Nurkic for some time before they acted – did they feel that they could increase his trade value prior to the trade deadline in 2016-17? Maybe. Further, Nurkic and his agent could have influenced the Nuggets’ decision at the 2017 deadline, threatening to stonewall Denver in negotiations.

Had Nurkic been more patient or the Nuggets acted sooner before it became abundantly clear that he was on the move, Denver’s roster could be even more stacked than it is now. Ultimately, the Nuggets have a plethora of talent and will be fine – while it appears that Nurkic found a long-term home in Portland, where he owns the paint offensively. Denver can’t be thrilled about assisting a division rival, but they’re still in an enviable position today and should be for years to come.

But despite that, this deal should go down as a cautionary tale – it’s not only the bottom feeders of the league who make missteps. Even the savviest of front offices overthink deals. Sometimes that works in their favor, and other times it does not.

Continue Reading

NBA

NBA Daily: They Guessed Wrong

Matt John reflects on some of the key decisions that were made last summer, and how their disappointing results hurt both team outlooks and players’ legacies.

Matt John

Published

on

It doesn’t sound possible, but did you know that the crazy NBA summer of 2019 was, in fact, over a year ago? Wildly, in any normal, non-pandemic season, it all would have been over three months ago and, usually, media days would be right around the corner, but not this time. The 2019-20 NBA season is slated to end sometime in early to mid-October, so the fact that the last NBA off-season was over a year ago hasn’t really dawned on anyone yet. Craziest of all, even though there will still be an offseason, there technically won’t be any summer.

Coronavirus has really messed up the NBA’s order. Of course, there are much worse horrors that COVID-19 has inflicted upon the world – but because of what it’s done to the NBA, let’s focus on that and go back to the summer of 2019. It felt like an eternity, but the Golden State Warriors’ three-year reign had finally reached its end. The Toronto Raptors’ victory over the tyranny that was the Hamptons Five – as battered as they were – made it feel like order had been restored to the NBA. There was more to it than that though.

Klay Thompson’s and Kevin Durant’s season-ending injuries, along with the latter skipping town to join Kyrie Irving in Brooklyn meant two things.

1. Golden State was down for the count
2. Brooklyn’s time wasn’t coming until next year.

A one-year window was open. Even if neither Golden State nor Brooklyn posed the same threat that the former did when it had Kevin Durant, those were two contenders out of commission. If there was a time to go all in, it was in 2019.

Milwaukee certainly seemed to go all in. For the most part.  Malcolm Brogdon’s departure seemed a little odd since he was arguably their best non-Giannis playmaker when they were in crunch time. Not to mention there was nothing really stopping the Bucks from keeping him except for money. Detractors will call out Milwaukee for electing to cheap out by not keeping Brogdon and hence, avoiding the luxury tax. However, there’s more to it than that.

Milwaukee thought it had enough with the core it had on its roster. Coming off the best season they had put up since the eighties, they believed the franchise built the right team to contend. There was an argument that keeping Brogdon may have been overkill with their guard depth – let’s not forget that Donte DiVincenzo did a solid job in Brogdon’s role as the backup facilitator. This would have been more defensible had it not been for Milwaukee picking the wrong guy to let go. That was the indefensible part- electing to keep Eric Bledsoe over Brogdon.

Bledsoe wasn’t necessarily a bad investment. No one’s complaining about an almost 15 point average on 47/34/79 splits or playing individual defense tight enough to get named on the All-Defensive second team. By all accounts, Bledsoe earns his keep. That is until the playoffs. Bledsoe’s postseason woes have been a weight ever since he first entered Milwaukee, and this postseason was more of the same.

Bledsoe’s numbers dwindled to just 11.7 points on 39/25/81 splits, and Milwaukee getting ousted in five games at the hands of Miami made his struggles stand out even more than it had ever been. Bledsoe may be the better athlete and the better defender, but Brogdon’s all-around offensive savvy and his only slight dropoff defensively from Brogdon would have made him a bit more reliable.

Milwaukee guessed wrong when they opted to extend Bledsoe before the postseason last year when they could have waited until that very time to evaluate who to keep around. Now they face a hell of a lot more questions than they did at the end of last season – questions that may have been avoided had they made the right choice.

Now they could have kept both of them, yes, but it’s not totally unreasonable to think that maybe their approach with the luxury tax would have worked and maybe they would still be in the postseason right now had they gone with the homegrown talent. And just maybe, there wouldn’t be nearly as much of this Greek Freak uncertainty.

The Houston Rockets can relate. They got bruised up by a team that everyone thought Houston had the edge on going into the series and then crushed by the Lakers. Now, Mike D’Antoni is gone. The full-time small ball experiment likely did not work out. Since the Rockets emptied most of their assets to bring in Russell Westbrook and Robert Covington, there may not be a route in which they can become better than they presently are.

The mistake wasn’t trading for Russell Westbrook. The mistake was trading Chris Paul.

To be fair, most everybody severely overestimated Chris Paul’s decline. He’s not among the best of the best anymore, but he’s still pretty darn close. He deserved his All-NBA second team selection as well as finishing No. 7 overall in MVP voting. OKC had no business being as good as they were this season, and Paul was the driving force as to why.

For all we know, the previously-assumed tension between Chris Paul and James Harden would have made its way onto the court no matter what. Even so, Houston’s biggest obstacle in the Bay Area had crumbled. If they had just stayed the course, maybe they’re still in the postseason too.

To their credit, none of this may have happened had it not been for the Kawhi Leonard decision. Had he chosen differently, the Thunder never blow it up, and Houston might have very well been the favorite in the Western Conference. Instead, the Rockets took a step back from being in the title discussion to dark horse. But at least they can take pride knowing that they weren’t expected to win it all – the Clippers can’t.

Seeing the Clippers fall well short expectations begs the question if they too got it wrong. The answer is, naturally: of course not. They may have paid a hefty price for Paul George, but the only way they were getting Kawhi Leonard – one of the best players of his generation – was if PG-13 came in the package. As lofty as it was, anyone would have done the same thing if they were in their shoes. They didn’t get it wrong. Kawhi did.

On paper, the Clippers had the most talented roster in the entire league. It seemed like they had every hole filled imaginable. Surrounding Leonard and George was three-point shooting, versatility, a productive second unit, an experienced coach – you name it. There was nothing stopping them from breaking the franchise’s long-lasting curse. Except themselves.

Something felt off about them. They alienated opponents. They alienated each other. At times, they played rather lackadaisically, like the title had already been signed, sealed, and delivered to them. The media all assumed they’d cut the malarkey and get their act together – but that moment never really came. They had their chances to put Denver away, but even if they had, after seeing their struggles to beat them – and to be fair Dallas too – would their day of destiny with the Lakers have really lived up to the hype?

Even if it was never in the cards, one can’t help but wonder what could have happened had Kawhi chosen to stay with the team he won his second title with.

Toronto was the most impressive team in this league this season. They still managed to stay at the top of the east in spite of losing an all-timer like Leonard. That team had every component of a winner except a superstar. They had the right culture for a championship team. Just not the right talent. The Clippers were the exact opposite. They had the right talent for a championship team but not the right culture. That’s why the Raptors walked away from the postseason feeling proud of themselves for playing to their full potential while the Clippers writhed in disappointment and angst over their future.

In the end, everyone mentioned here may ultimately blame what happened to their season on the extenuating circumstances from the pandemic. The Bucks’ chemistry never fully returned when the Bubble started. Contracting COVID and dealing with quad problems prevented Westbrook from reviving the MVP-type player he was before the hiatus. As troubling as the Clippers had played, the extra time they would have had to work things out in a normal season was taken away from them.

For all we know, next year will be a completely different story. The Rockets, Bucks, and Kawhi may ultimately have their faith rewarded for what they did in the summer of 2019 – but that will only be mere speculation until the trio can change the story.

Continue Reading

NBA

Looking Toward The Draft: Power Forwards

Basketball Insiders continues their NBA Draft watch, this time with the power forwards.

David Yapkowitz

Published

on

We got some updated NBA draft news this week when the league announced that several key dates have been pushed back including the draft, the start of free agency and the beginning of the 2020-21 season.

The 2020 draft was originally scheduled for Oct. 16, but it will now likely occur sometime in November. Obviously, with the COVID-19 pandemic still wildly out of control in the United States, all of these potential deadlines are fluid and subject to change.

With that said, we’re continuing our position by position breakdown here at Basketball Insiders of some of the top 2020 draft prospects. We looked at the point guards and shooting guards last week, and this week we’re covering the small forwards and power forwards.

The power forward crop, like the draft overall, doesn’t appear to be as strong as recent years, that doesn’t mean there aren’t potential contributors and high-level NBA players available, as well as one who might just turn out to be a star-caliber player.

Onyeka Okongwu, USC – 19 years old

Okongwu is the player who just might develop into a star on some level. He was actually underrated in high school and was snubbed for a McDonald’s All-American selection his senior year. He established himself early on at USC as the team’s best player as a freshman and now appears to have turned some heads.

He’s been mentioned as a lottery pick and in some mock drafts, he’s top 4-5. He possesses a great all-around skill-set; he can score in the post, he can put the ball on the floor and attack and he can shoot. But perhaps his biggest attribute is his versatility on the defensive end. He’s got quick feet and mobility and can guard multiple positions.

Okongwu might actually play center in the NBA, especially in small-ball lineups, but he’s mostly played power forward and so he’ll probably see time there in the league. His skill-set fits perfectly with today’s game.

Obi Toppin, Dayton – 22 years old

Toppin is one of the older players in the draft, and in recent history, players that age tend to slip on draft boards. In Toppin’s case, it looks like the reverse might actually be true. He’s been projected as a lottery pick, and even going in the top 3.

He’s an incredibly athletic player who thrives in the open court. He looks like he’ll do well in an up-tempo offensive system that has capable playmakers who can find him in transition. He’s extremely active around the rim and he can finish strong. A decent shooter too, something he’ll need at the next level.

Toppin has the physical tools to be an effective defensive player, but that’s where the questions marks on him have been. In the NBA, he’s likely going to have to play and guard multiple positions. Whether or not he can adapt to that likely will answer the question as to what his ceiling can be.

Precious Achiuwa, Memphis – 20 years old

Achiuwa is another intriguing prospect. this writer actually got to watch him play in person while he was in high school and he was very impressive. He looked like a man among boys. He’s projected to be a late lottery pick.

He has an NBA-ready body and he’s got some toughness around the rim and in the paint. He was a double-double threat during his one season at Memphis and his knack for rebounding is something that should translate to the NBA. He’s a very good defender too, in particular, as a rim protector. He’s very quick and has the ability to guard multiple positions.

One of the main knocks on Achiuwa is his shooting ability. He didn’t shoot that well in college and power forwards being able to space the floor is almost a requirement in today’s NBA game. It’s something he can certainly work on and improve on though.

Honorable Mentions:
Paul Reed, DePaul – 21 years old
Xavier Tillman, Michigan State – 21 years old
Killian Tillie, Gonzaga – 22 years old

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Online Betting Site Betway
Advertisement
American Casino Guide
NJ Casino
NJ Casino

NBA Team Salaries

Advertisement

CloseUp360

Insiders On Twitter

NBA On Twitter

Trending Now